Rabu, 29 Januari 2014

The Malaysian Insider :: Features


Klik GAMBAR Dibawah Untuk Lebih Info
Sumber Asal Berita :-

The Malaysian Insider :: Features


Slovenia struggles to let go of treasured state companies

Posted: 28 Jan 2014 11:14 PM PST

January 29, 2014

The gloves came off as Joseph A. Mussomeli neared the end of his tenure as Washington's envoy to Slovenia, a posting that coincided with the country's narrow escape from submission to an international bailout.

An American firm was in the running to buy Slovenia's Fotona, a state-owned developer of medical and military laser gear with big sales in the United States. It was a rare example of this ex-communist country, now proud of its euro zone membership, selling a treasured corporate possession.

"Everything was agreed," Mussomeli told the Slovenian daily Finance in December, a month before he left the country.

"Then, despite assurances from senior government circles, PDP (the state fund with a majority stake in Fotona) suddenly came forward and demanded the price go up by one million euros ($1.4 million).

"It's not so much about the money," he said, "it's just another example that puts Slovenia in a bad light abroad."

More than two years after it was first put up for sale, Fotona is first in line this week for privatisation by a state used to controlling 50% of the economy.

The American company, Technology4Medicine, is still in the running, alongside private equity fund Alpe-Adria-Balkan Fund.

Slovenian media reports have disputed Mussomeli's characterisation of the state fund's tactics. Either way, the country long expected to be the economic success story of the ex-Yugoslav republics has a dismal record on privatisation.

Having scraped together funds to bail out its banks last month, Slovenia must now sell assets once considered sacrosanct by 2 million Slovenians who, unlike the rest of Eastern Europe, resisted Western capital after the end of the Cold War.

The risk is that big companies go at knock-down prices to buyers keenly aware that Slovenia needs the cash urgently.

Some in the disparate coalition government are openly hostile to selling off healthy household names, regardless of the banking troubles blamed on politically-motivated lending.

"Privatisation is key to breaking the vicious circle of state-owned enterprises, state-owned banks and interests of political elites," said Otila Dhand of Teneo Intelligence, a London-based think-tank.

Crony capitalism

Final bids for Fotona are due on Thursday.

More than a dozen other companies are on the block, including Telekom, the biggest telecom group, Ljubljana airport, flag carrier Adria Airways and No. 2 bank NKBM.

Two recessions since 2009 have exposed corruption and crony capitalism. As the global crisis ravaged Slovenia's exports, bad loans at state banks soared to around 25% of national output.

"The arrival of foreigners is becoming a reality which we long refused to face up to," said Lidija Jerkic, head of Slovenia's national union of metal workers. "Given the dearth of cash and the state of our economy... it's one of the last remaining options if we want to preserve it."

Prime Minister Alenka Bratusek told Reuters this week that the main state investment fund, SOD, "has informed us of a detailed timetable for the sale of 14 companies, which we have not made public yet."

Analysts, however, are doubtful. The Social Democrats, the second biggest party in the four-way ruling alliance, have openly opposed privatisation in the past.

"Our stand is that the strategy must determine which firms are of strategic interest, in which the state should keep a small controlling stake, and which should be sold off entirely," party leader Igor Luksic told Reuters last week in an emailed statement.

Former finance minister France Krizanic, a senior party ally of Luksic, was more direct: "We're not talking about a float on the stock exchange but a sale to likely direct competitors. With that, the national economy loses jobs and free cash flow."

After coalition talks on Monday, the Social Democrats appeared to support the sale of Telekom and Ljubljana airport, but said they had regrets. The agreement to sell "was not thought through," a party statement said.

"Rules of the game"

Such remarks will unnerve markets still uncertain whether Bratusek can hold the government together now that it has staved off the immediate threat of a bailout.

Telekom represents the biggest prize. The government is trying to attract interest from Deutsche Telekom and Telenor. It has hired Citi to organise the sale of a roughly 75% stake.

As for bank NKBM, recapitalised and now fully owned by the state, Slovenian media say Hungary's OTP and the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD) may be interested.

"We will look positively at investments in the banking sector as well as incorporates, but we need a clearer sense of the rules of the game," EBRD chief economist Eric Bergloff told Reuters.

Another milestone could be the sale of leading local retailer Mercator to Croatian rival Agrokor. Negotiations have dragged on since 2011. "It will be resolved one way or another by the end of this week," a source close to Agrokor told Reuters.

Then there are the unions, up in arms after layoffs followed the October sale of the first company on the privatisation list, paint and varnish producer Helios.

"Unions will never agree to the formula 'more privatisations, fewer workers'," Slovenia's Association of Independent Unions wrote in an open letter to Bratusek last month.

As the sale of Fotona neared, however, union leaders appeared more resigned. "The buyer will probably be a foreigner. We can only hope they preserve the company in its current form," said Fotona union representative Bruno Reja.

"We do expect drastic changes, however, as happened with other companies sold to foreigners, like layoffs or closing of whole departments," he said. "Foreigners only focus on profit. – Reuters, January 29, 2014.

Money and pride keep families apart at China’s New Year

Posted: 28 Jan 2014 08:29 PM PST

January 29, 2014

A couple look at Chinese New Year lanterns decorating Yuyuan Garden in downtown Shanghai, yesterday. - Reuters pic, January 29, 2014.A couple look at Chinese New Year lanterns decorating Yuyuan Garden in downtown Shanghai, yesterday. - Reuters pic, January 29, 2014.As millions join the world's largest annual human migration, some in China will not return home for the Lunar New Year, fearing the rising costs of seasonal gifts and ridicule from their families.

Nanny and cleaner Tian earns 3,500 yuan (RM1,921) a month looking after the children of an expat couple in Beijing, and has not seen her own family in two years.

But if she goes home to Henan province, 800 kilometres to the south, she will be expected to hand out just as much – in red envelopes known as hongbao – to non-working members of her extended family, especially children.

"I have many nieces and nephews and I really can't afford the amount I will have to pay for each of their hongbaos," said the 46-year-old, slurping noodle soup in a heated high-rise apartment.

Instead Tian – who only wanted her surname used – will stay in the capital, where she can earn a bonus of her own.

"Staying in Beijing I can make four or maybe five thousand yuan, and during public holidays I can get double pay on top of that," she added, looking downwards with a smile at fellow migrant workers waiting for buses in the cold street below, their belongings loaded on their backs.

The Lunar New Year, known as the Spring Festival in China, is the only time that many of China's 245 million migrants will see their families all year.

The country's rush to the cities is the greatest human movement in history, but has thrown up a range of social consequences, particularly for children "left behind" in the care of often elderly relatives.

Even so financial pressures in an increasingly wealthy but unequal society are such that a growing number of migrants are choosing to spend the festival at their place of work.

Another nanny, who gave her surname as Lou, lamented the costs and trouble of the holidays ahead of a 1,600-kilometre coach journey back to the northwestern province of Gansu.

"It's not just the cost of the hongbaos, but I also have to travel to see all my family, which is a lot of time and cost as they are scattered across the countryside," said Lou, whose seat for the 21-hour journey cost her 217 yuan.

As Lou prepared for her gruelling trek from the booming capital to the dusty, arid backwater she calls home, some of China's poorest citizens were heading the other way in search of opportunity.

"We have had over 100 domestic workers turn up in the city just before the Spring Festival looking for work, which is far more than last year," said a woman surnamed Ge who works at a Beijing branch of national domestic cleaning agency Fuping.

"There is the demand, because not that many domestic workers stay in the city, and of course, the pay is better this time of year," she added.

About a third of China's migrants – who mainly work in the construction, manufacturing and domestic servant industries – do not return home for the New Year, according to a recent survey.

Almost a fifth of migrants who were staying at their workplace said it would be easier to find better work during the holiday period – while another 18% said they were afraid of being ridiculed by parents for not having a girlfriend or boyfriend.

The same proportion cited the costs involved, according to the survey of 13,200 migrants from job hunting website daguu.com.

But the biggest single reason for not returning, at 36%, was embarrassment at having earned too little.

With average urban incomes around 2,500 yuan a month, the prospect of making twice that much is enough to delay seeing their relatives.

"I may go and see the family in the summer when I will have more money... and it won't be so cold then," said Tian, huddling against the radiator. - AFP, January 29, 2014.

Kredit: http://www.themalaysianinsider.com

0 ulasan:

Catat Ulasan

 

Malaysia Insider Online

Copyright 2010 All Rights Reserved