Selasa, 6 September 2011

The Malaysian Insider :: Sports

0 ulasan
Klik GAMBAR Dibawah Untuk Lebih Info
Sumber Asal Berita :-

The Malaysian Insider :: Sports


Tsonga, Simon to lead French Davis Cup challenge

Posted: 06 Sep 2011 08:27 AM PDT

Jo-Wilfried Tsonga of France serves to Mardy Fish of the US during their match at the US Open tennis tournament in New York, September 5, 2011. – Reuters pic

PARIS, Sept 6 – Jo-Wilfried Tsonga and Gilles Simon will lead France's bid to beat Spain in this month's Davis Cup semi-final, the French federation (FFT) said today.

Gael Monfils, seventh in the ATP standings, and Richard Gasquet (13th) were the other two players captain Guy Forget picked for the Sept. 16-18 contest in Cordoba, Spain.

Michael Llodra and Julien Benneteau were selected as substitutes.

World number 11 Tsonga reached the US Open quarter-finals yesterday by beating American Mardy Fish and world number 12 Simon will be out to emulate his compatriot when he faces John Isner later today. – Reuters

Iraq defeat Singapore to give coach Zico a first win

Posted: 06 Sep 2011 07:47 AM PDT

Singapore's Fazrul Nawaz Shahul Hameed (R) and Iraq's Samar Saeed fight for the ball during their 2014 FIFA World Cup qualifier soccer match in Singapore September 6, 2011. – Reuters pic

SINGAPORE, Sept 6 – Iraq bounced back from their shock loss to Jordan at home last week by defeating Singapore 2-0 at the Jalan Besar stadium today in their Asian World Cup qualifier to give coach Zico his first win.

The former Brazilian midfielder's side took the lead on 49 minutes thanks to a headed goal from Ala'a Abdulzehra and the team responded by kissing the artificial turf.

Zico had criticised the surface a day earlier as being more suitable for schoolboys than World Cup qualifiers.

Iraq continued to pump high balls into their smaller opponents' box and their tactics paid off in the 85th minute when captain Younus Mahmood got a touch over the keeper's head.

Singapore, who failed to get a shot on goal in the first hour, played without any direction from the sideline as coach Raddy Avramovich was serving a one-match touchline ban for being sent off in Kunming last week.

Singapore are at the bottom of Group A while Iraq are level on points with Jordan and China who meet later later today in Amman. – Reuters

Kredit: http://www.themalaysianinsider.com

The Malaysian Insider :: Showbiz

0 ulasan
Klik GAMBAR Dibawah Untuk Lebih Info
Sumber Asal Berita :-

The Malaysian Insider :: Showbiz


Oliver Stone’s son in Iran to ‘prepare’ documentary

Posted: 06 Sep 2011 09:08 AM PDT

Mehr news agency reported that Stone (pic) will be joining his son in Iran at the end of the month. — Reuters file pic

TEHRAN, Sept 6 — The son of US film director Oliver Stone — who angered some Americans with a recent movie about anti-US Latin American leaders — is in Iran doing the groundwork for a documentary, Iranian media reported today.

"Sean Stone has come to Iran and wants to prepare the ground for making a documentary," Mehrdad Hojjati, an Iranian film producer, was quoted as saying by the ILNA news agency.

Another news agency, Mehr, reported that Oliver Stone, whom it described as an "anti-American system" director, would join his son on September 26 to help out.

The reports did not say what the film would be about.

In his 2009 documentary "South of the Border", Oliver Stone interviewed several leftist Latin American leaders, including Cuba's Raul Castro and Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez who is a close ally of Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, a persistent critic of the US.

In 2009, Stone said he had been in talks with Iranian officials to make a documentary about Ahmadinejad but that scheduling on both sides had prevented it.

The US, dubbed "the Great Satan" by leaders of the Islamic Republic, has not had diplomatic ties with Tehran since the storming of the US embassy in the wake of the 1979 Islamic Revolution.

Sean Stone, 26, is listed on the IMDB.com website as a documentary filmmaker and actor, having small roles in some of his father's movies. — Reuters

Spies and dropouts in Venice for the Golden Lion

Posted: 06 Sep 2011 08:37 AM PDT

Actor Gary Oldman and wife Alexandra Edenborough arrive for the screening of "Tinker, Tailor, Soldier, Spy" at the 68th Venice Film Festival September 5, 2011. — AFP/Relaxnews pic

VENICE, Sept 6 — Spies, torture and betrayal have come to Venice with Tomas Alfredson's cold war thriller, "Tinker, Taylor, Soldier, Spy" — an espionage whodunit, without a James Bond gadget or femme fatale in sight.

The Swedish director's adaptation of John le Carre's bestselling novel peers into the dark heart of "the Circus" in the 1970s, as the circle tightens on a mole at the top of British intelligence leaking secrets to the Soviets.

Control, played by John Hurt, has five suspects in mind and turns the search over to his faithful right-hand man George Smiley, who must stealthily work under the radar with just a handful of trusted men to track down the culprit.

Like a chess game, Smiley, played by an inscrutable Gary Oldman, must outwit the so-called Tailor (Academy Award winner Colin Firth), Tinker (Toby Jones) and Soldier (Ciaran Hinds) while keeping the rogue agent (Tom Hardy) alive.

The script's minimal dialogue highlights Alfredson's indulgence in visual detail in a film set for the most part indoors in the warren of corridors at the MI6 headquarters in London as well as safe houses in Istanbul and Turkey.

As well as working closely with le Carre, a former MI5 and MI6 officer, the scriptwriters consulted with other agents who were reportedly "touched" by the film, which critics have already tipped to win Venice's Golden Lion award.

The extra scenes added to the novel's plot came from true MI5 stories including a riotous party that had to be broken up by the police, the cast said at a press conference ahead of the film's world premiere yesterday evening.

Benedict Cumberbatch, who plays a younger intelligence officer who loyally helps track down the mole for Smiley, said "Tinker, Tailor" moved beyond its cold war narrative to explore the universal themes of alienation and sacrifice.

"The film is an essay on being male in an isolating workplace, of the loneliness of that world — and all you're left with is the trust of your colleagues and your morality," he said.

Male loneliness is also key to Todd Solondz's excellent superb new film "Dark Horse," starring Justin Bartha, Selma Blair, Mia Farrow, Zachary Booth and Christopher Walken, and premiered in the floating city yesterday as well.

To the surprise of his cult fans, the US director — of "Welcome to the Dollhouse," "Happiness" and "Life During Wartime" fame — tempered his trademark biting humour with compassion, tenderness and a touch of redemption.

The dark comedy tells the tale of 30-something Abe, who still lives with his parents and clings to his adolescence, rejecting adult responsibilities in favour of expanding his cherished collection of toys and action figures.

A college dropout who argues incessantly with his father and is coddled by his mother, the largely friendless Abe grabs the chance for true love when he meets Miranda, a depressed 30-something whose life is in tatters.

Though the overweight Abe energetically throws himself into his new romance, he is unable to create any real intimacy with his betrothed and, tormented by fears and haunted by dark dreams, his life slips quickly towards tragedy.

"It's funny, because as much as it's a comedy of sorts, I don't ever really laugh when I watch it. It's very sorrowful, and there's a melancholy to the experience," Solondz said in Venice after an advance press screening.

The title "Dark Horse," he said, conjures up Abe's untapped potential — "a long shot of sorts, an outsider so to speak" — just one of a generation of men who have failed to make the transition from adolescence to adulthood.

"The character has a collection but, more tellingly, the collection owns him," he said. Such infantalism "is very symptomatic of a consumerist society," where prized objects replace a longed-for intimacy, Solondz said.

Laugh-out-loud scenes mix with moments of quiet despair and compassion to create a poignant and melancholy tale which fulfilled the director's main aim: "to see if I could make a movie without rape, paedophilia or masturbation." — AFP/Relaxnews

Kredit: http://www.themalaysianinsider.com

The Malaysian Insider :: Features

0 ulasan
Klik GAMBAR Dibawah Untuk Lebih Info
Sumber Asal Berita :-

The Malaysian Insider :: Features


Philippines creates haven for endangered duck

Posted: 06 Sep 2011 03:32 AM PDT

Philippine Duck or Anas luzonica – Photo by Robbie Taylor/shutterstock.com

MANILA, Sept 6 – The Philippines has created a protected area to save a species of endangered wild duck, with just 5,000 of the birds remaining, government documents released yesterday said.

The 27 hectare "wetland critical habitat" was set up for the Philippine duck, a species found only in the Philippines whose numbers have been falling due to hunting and habitat destruction, the documents said.

The environment department order created the protected area in the largely-agricultural Cabusao district in the east of the country.

"Ensure that existing ecosystems in the critical habitat are preserved and are kept in a condition that will support the perpetual existence of the Philippine duck," the department order instructed local authorities.

The Philippine duck, whose scientific name is "Anas luzonica", is rated as "vulnerable" by the conservation group BirdLife International, which estimated in 2005 that as few as 5,000 of them may be left.

On its website, BirdLife said the main threats to the species were excessive hunting and the use of its habitats for drainage and aquaculture – the farming of aquatic organisms – and excessive use of pesticides in rice farms.

The duck is described as having a blue-grey bill, a "rusty cinnamon" head and neck, and brown and grey feathers. It feeds on fish, shrimps, insects, rice and other plants. – AFP

Walnuts may help fight breast cancer

Posted: 05 Sep 2011 02:32 AM PDT

About two small handfuls of walnuts a day may significantly cut your risks of breast cancer, researchers said. – Photo by JKlingebiel

LOS ANGELES, Sept 5 – New research suggests women defend themselves against breast cancer with none other than a nutcracker: eating about two small handfuls of walnuts everyday may "significantly" curb your risks of the disease.

The study announced last week was conducted by researchers at Marshall University in the US who found that a daily dose of walnuts – equal to 2 ounces a day for humans – reduces the growth of breast cancer tumours in mice.

The study is published in the journal Nutrition and Cancer.

"Food is important medicine in our diet," said the study's led researcher Elaine Hardman. "What we put into our bodies makes a big difference – it determines how the body functions, our reaction to illness and health." She adds: "The simple stuff really works: eat right, get off the couch, and turn off the TV."

Other good reasons to nibble walnuts? Walnuts are loaded with antioxidant polyphenols, compounds that interact with free radicals to stabilise them and prevent them from wreaking havoc on our cells.

Walnuts also have almost twice as many antioxidant polyphenols as almonds, peanuts, pistachios, hazelnuts, cashews, macadamias, Brazil nuts, and pecans, researchers said.

"A handful of walnuts contains almost twice as much antioxidants as an equivalent amount of any other commonly consumed nut," said US chemistry professor and study researcher Joe Vinson, who completed a separate study on walnuts announced earlier this year. "But unfortunately, people don't eat a lot of them."

Plus, like all nuts, walnuts are loaded with protein, fibre, vitamins, and minerals. – AFP

Kredit: http://www.themalaysianinsider.com

The Malaysian Insider :: Books

0 ulasan
Klik GAMBAR Dibawah Untuk Lebih Info
Sumber Asal Berita :-

The Malaysian Insider :: Books


Favourite Barnes makes Booker shortlist of 6 authors

Posted: 06 Sep 2011 04:05 AM PDT

LONDON, Sept 6 — English author Julian Barnes was one of six authors shortlisted for the coveted Man Booker Prize for Fiction today, and he is the bookmakers' favourite to win the award when it is announced in October.

Barnes (picture), nominated for "The Sense of an Ending", appears on the shortlist for the fourth time following "Flaubert's Parrot" (1984), "England, England" (1998) and "Arthur and George" (2005), but has never won.

His relationship with the Man Booker Prize, one of the world's most important awards for English language fiction, has not always been easy.

He once referred to it as "posh bingo" and berated judges for being "inflated by their brief celebrity".

Also on the shortlist this year are two first-time novelists — Stephen Kelman ("Pigeon English") and A.D. Miller ("Snowdrops") — and two Canadians — Patrick deWitt ("The Sisters Brothers") and Esi Edugyan ("Half Blood Blues").

Rounding out the nominees is Carol Birch with "Jamrach's Menagerie".

The award, worth GBP50,000 (RM239,969) to the winner as well as the likelihood of a huge boost in sales of the winning book, will be handed out on October 18. — Reuters

Anniversary brings avalanche of 9/11 books

Posted: 05 Sep 2011 06:58 PM PDT

NEW YORK, Sept 6 — The 10th anniversary of the September 11 attacks has unleashed a publishing avalanche, with a crush of new books about the fateful day and new editions of older works like Noam Chomsky's "9-11."

Among the new accounts is "After the Fall: New Yorkers Remember September 11 and the Years that Followed," which sets out to show how New York changed after the attacks that brought down the World Trade Center.

The book presents interviews with hundreds of people from different parts of the city — first responders, taxi drivers, teachers, artists, religious leaders, immigrants — by Columbia University's Oral History Research Office.

"The result is a remarkable time-lapse account of the city as it changed in the wake of 9/11," its publisher The New Press says in an introduction to "After the Fall."

Another new book is "The Eleventh Day: The Full Story of 9/11 and Osama bin Laden" by Anthony Summers and Robbyn Swan Drawing, which publisher Ballantine Books touts as "the first panoramic, authoritative look back at 9/11."

It draws on recently released documents, interviews and "the perspective that can come only from a decade of research and reflection," Ballantine says.

September 11 and its aftermath also have inspired works of fiction like "The Submission," a novel by former New York Times reporter Amy Waldman.

It imagines what would have happened if a jury responsible for picking a proposal for a memorial at Ground Zero had chosen a design by an American Muslim architect.

At least two books are cast as tributes to the victims of 9/11, including "9/11: The World Speaks," which includes more than 200,000 messages from people from around the world who have visited the Tribute WTC Visitor Center, which opened in 2006 near the site of the Twin Towers.

The attack was the deadliest ever on US soil with Al-Qaeda militants in hijacked airliners toppling the New York landmark, smashing into the Pentagon, and crashing into a field in Pennsylvania. Nearly 3,000 people died.

The anniversary has been an occasion to re-release books which some critics consider fundamental to understanding September 11 and the war against terrorism that has ensued over the past decade.

One of those is Chomsky's "9-11," which first came out just a month after the attacks. In it, the American activist and intellectual retraces what he sees as the roots of the attacks and offers a critical vision of US foreign policy.

Another is "The 9/11 Commission Report," a riveting account of the attacks that became a surprise best-seller in 2004 after it was first published by the National Commission on Terrorist Attacks Upon the United States.

The new edition includes an epilogue from the commission's director analyzing what came of the panel's recommendations.

"We are much less vulnerable than we were before 9/11," former commission chairman Tom Kean told AFP in a recent interview. "Despite this considerable progress, some major 9/11 commission recommendations remain unfulfilled."

The bipartisan body spent 20 months studying the deadliest terrorist attack on American soil and produced an authoritative 2004 report.

To mark the 10th anniversary of the attacks, the former commissioners issued a "report card," grading the US government on its performance and concluding it had fallen short on nine of its 41 recommendations.

One obvious failure: no legislation has been enacted to reserve a block of the communications spectrum so that police, firefighters and medics can use one secure channel. — AFP-Relaxnews

Kredit: http://www.themalaysianinsider.com

The Malaysian Insider :: Opinion

0 ulasan
Klik GAMBAR Dibawah Untuk Lebih Info
Sumber Asal Berita :-

The Malaysian Insider :: Opinion


The story of true jihad (Part 2)

Posted: 05 Sep 2011 05:04 PM PDT

SEPT 6 — Last year, after getting some Kinokuniya book coupons for a speaking engagement I decided to cash it in on a few books including John W. Kiser's "Commander of the Faithful: the Story of True Jihad". This was a biography of Amir Abdul Qadir al-Jazairi — known as Emir Abd el-Kader to the West. 

I was spooked as I had never heard of Abdul Qadir. What was perplexing still was that it was authored by a non-Muslim Westerner. Having finished reading the extraordinary book I thought to myself, surely I would have heard about Abdul Qadir's story before from Muslims? But I could not recall it.  

Well, the story should be compulsory reading for all Muslims. 

The great American Sunni scholar Sheikh Hamza Yusuf congratulates the author for his effort: "I hope this finds you in good health. I was very happy as I am currently reading your book on Emir A.Q. [sic], who I have been reading for over twenty years. One of his books has been by my bedside for some time [italics mine]. Your work is most excellent and timely. I hope it gets a widespread distribution and reading."

It now makes sense why Hamza has been a true voice of reason and moderation. A convert to Islam, Hamza was trained in the classical Islamic sciences in the Middle East and Africa.

He was the first American to teach in the Qarawiyin in Fes, Morocco's oldest and most prestigious university. He established the Zaytuna Institute in the US in order to revive the study of the traditional Islamic sciences in the West. 

In the aftermath of September 11, 2001, Hamza courted controversy for condemning terrorism and for advising US President George W. Bush. Hamza actually did that on the advice of his teacher Sheikh Abdullah bin Bayyah and Hamza later said: "I advised George Bush but he didn't take my advice."

Hamza became a prominent critic of the war on terror, but his early overtures to Bush have been attacked by many Muslims. If one is to look at how the Prophet responded to his enemies; or how Salahuddin al-Ayubi, who liberated Jerusalem from the Crusaders, could deal with his military enemy Richard the Lionheart of England with great respect and chivalry — then Hamza's actions come as no surprise.

Having read about Amir Abdul Qadir al-Jazairi, one further understands why he is a great influence on Hamza.

Kiser begins his book by looking at Elkader, a town in Iowa, the US and traces the roots of its uncommon name. The town was named after Abdul Qadir whom the town's founders described as "a daring Arab chieftain." 

Abdul Qadir was only 24 when he was appointed Amir of the tribes in Algeria. Even though young, he was well-educated — he memorised the Quran and trained in horsemanship and theology.

He completed his hajj to Mecca at 17 and met a young Imam Shamil from Daghestan (which includes modern-day Chechnya in Russia). The experience of the pilgrimage and visiting sacred sites in Cairo, Damascus and Baghdad had a profound impact on his piety and religiousness. 

As Amir of Algeria, he led the resistance against the French invasion. What earned him global respect and admiration was his chivalry. Abdul Qadir released the French prisoners when he had insufficient food to feed them. 

He rewarded Arabs who captured French prisoners alive and treated them well. He invited the Bishop of Algeria, Dupuch, to send priests to his prison camps for the spiritual fulfilment of his prisoners. 

What was more remarkable was that the French, who justified their imperial aggression as la mission civilsatrice (the civilising mission), were ruthless invaders.

But being a pious and principled Muslim, Abdul Qadir did not stoop down to the level of his enemies, but continued to occupy the moral high ground as enjoined by Islam. He drew admiration from his enemies, to the point that a few of those sent to fight him converted to Islam and joined his troops. 

After a 17-year battle when the French scorched-earth tactics and superior military technology defeated Abdul Qadir's gallant chivalrous resistance, the Amir of Algeria surrendered in 1847.

He was detained in France. For five years, the Amir stayed in the country of his enemy but was visited by countless French dignitaries who were curious to meet him. The Muslims were supposedly ruthless barbarians, yet how could this man inspire so much admiration from the French soldiers who fought him?

The citizens of Bordeaux even put Abdul Qadir's name on the ballot as a French presidential candidate in 1849! 

In 1852, Abdul Qadir was released by Napoleon III on the condition that he could not disturb Algeria again. The Amir obliged as all he wanted was to die in a Muslim land. He first went to Bursa, Turkey but ended up in Damascus — both then dominions of the Ottoman Sultan. 

But the Ottoman Empire then was crumbling, earning its name as the Sick Man of Europe. Technologically, Muslims were being left behind by a resurgent Europe. But most importantly spiritually too, many Muslims had forgotten the moral high ground that Islam taught them to occupy as they became consumed in the siege mentality of a crumbling civilisation. 

The Europeans took advantage of this as the Great Powers eyed different parts of the Ottoman Empire by fomenting religious tensions. In the past, the Christians and Jews of the Ottoman Empire lived largely in peace. Using the guise of protecting the Christian minorities, the Great Powers sought to have greater say in the Ottoman Empire. 

It was against this backdrop of religious tensions that a conflict between the Druze and Maronites of Mount Lebanon spread to Damascus. Abdul Qadir and his entourage made a point to save many Christians, bringing them to his palatial mansion. When this news reached the mob, they gathered at his door to protest.

As Kiser wrote:

"Give us the Christians," the crowd shouted after he (Abdul Qadir) had quieted it with his presence.

"My brothers, your behaviour violates the law of God. What makes you think you have a right to go around killing innocent people? Have you sunk so low that you are slaughtering women and children? Didn't God say in our holy book, Whoever kills a man who has never committed murder or created disorder in the land will be regarded as a murderer of all humanity?"

"Give us the Christians! We want the Christians!"

"Didn't God say there should be no constraint in religion," the emir (sic) vainly replied. 

"Oh holy warrior," cried out one of the leaders of the mob. "We don't want your advice. Why do you stick your nose in our business?"

"You have killed Christians yourself," shouted another. "How can you oppose us for avenging their insults. You are like the infidels yourself — hand over those you are protecting in your home, or you will be punished the same as those you are hiding."

"You are fools! The Christians I killed were invaders and occupiers who were ravaging our country. If acting against God's law doesn't frighten you, then think about the punishment you will receive from men… It will be terrible, I promise. If you will not listen to me, then God didn't provide you with reason — you are like animals who are aroused only by the sight of grass and water…

"As long as one of my soldiers is still standing, you will not touch them. They are my guests. Murderers of women and children, you sons of sin, try to take one of these Christians and you will learn how well my soldiers fight." The emir (sic) turned to Kara Mohamed. "Get my weapons, my horse. We will fight for a just cause, just as the one we fought for before."

"God is great," his men shouted, brandishing their guns and swords. Faced with the emir's (sic) battle-hardened veterans, the crowd melted away bravely hurling insults. 

This is such a beautiful story. Anyone with a basic grasp of Islam will know that the Amir stuck to the principles taught by Islam. But it is so difficult to find a modern living example of someone sticking to Islam in such a principled manner, bound by reason and compassion without yielding to raw emotion as we have seen in many Muslims these days. 

Abdul Qadir was not the only Muslim to do so. Christians in mixed neighbourhoods praised the Muslims for restraining violence and protecting their Christian neighbours. These included scholars such as Sheikh Salim Attar, Salih Agha al-Mahayini, Said Agha al-Nuri, Umar Agha al-Abid and others. 

But Abdul Qadir's heroics attracted global attention. He was praised by the Ottoman Sultan in Istanbul but also received the French Legion of Honour, gifts from Pope Leo IX and Queen Victoria. Abraham Lincoln sent him colt pistols inscribed with a congratulatory message all the way from the United States.

Most importantly, Imam Shamil of Daghestan, whom Abdul Qadir met in Mecca as a young man and became a hero in his own right for resisting Russian imperialism, wrote a letter to the Amir after reading about his exploits.

Shamil, another Sufi warrior who was hurt by the unIslamic actions of many Muslims in Damascus, was relieved to hear that his old friend stood up to the extremists and upheld the true Sharia. 

Islam is not against war in toto: war is allowed under certain circumstances. But the war must be a just war, under strict principles that preceded the Geneva Convention by over 1,000 years. While retributive justice is permitted under the Sharia, forfeiting that right is deemed superior. 

Why? This is because while a just war and a defensive war is jihad, the Prophet reminded us that the greater jihad is jihad un nafs or jihad against the self.

The spiritual battle is a must before one talks about the physical, lesser jihad. But the spirit is a forgotten aspect among many Muslims today. 

This brings me back to the fact that the story of Abdul Qadir was brought to me by a non-Muslim Western author. 

The Prophet Muhammad s.a.w. left us with a beautiful hadith:

"The word of wisdom is the lost property of the believer, so wherever he finds it he has a better right to it."

This hadith was held by the earlier Muslims closely that they engaged and interacted with the Roman, Greek, Persian and Indian civilisations, resulting in Islam's old Golden Age.

It was after all the work of the Muslims that preserved many philosophical and scientific works from the ancient Greeks and Romans while Europe was undergoing its Dark Ages. 

Is it not ironic that it took a non-Muslim Westerner to chronicle this wonderful story of a Muslim? Shouldn't we now reclaim the story as our lost property?

If only our Friday sermons and TV preachers talk about Islam as a blessing to mankind instead of racist-tinged angry diatribes that do not reflect the beauty of Islam. 

* The views expressed here are the personal opinion of the columnist.

Behind the veil of transparency

Posted: 05 Sep 2011 04:46 PM PDT

SEPT 6 — Resorting to litigation is normally an indicator of two things. The first is that all other avenues have been exhausted. The second is that there is some form of entitlement that the party is seeking to enforce. 

A divorcing couple may dispute rights to the matrimonial home. Two feuding companies may argue over their respective contractual rights in a business agreement. Heck, an individual may even contend for the right to change the name, gender or religion listed on his identity card. 

The key thing to note here is that the centre of a legal dispute always involves rights of some sort. With rights, comes a sense of entitlement. We file a lawsuit because we believe we are entitled to something. 

Thus, to sue a government-linked company for not offering you one of its three scholarship positions will naturally raise a few eyebrows. 

This lawsuit gives rise to two difficult issues. 

Firstly, what is the nature of a scholarship? Do we have a right to a scholarship? Are we now so dependent on government or external handouts that we feel our individual children are entitled to what is in essence an all-expense-paid luxury? 

Granted, an overseas education, especially in certain Western countries, does not come cheap. It costs, for example, close to RM1 million to pursue a medical degree in the UK. 

To add to the problem, most middle-income families are put in the difficult position of having just enough money to fund the first year or so of the course, which in effect disqualifies them from being instantly granted scholarships, but having not quite enough to pay for the entire course.

But while it seems that everyone wants to read for a degree overseas, it would not be a gross exaggeration to say that the majority of people end up furthering their studies locally instead, with financial reasons being the main deciding factor.

Debate however much you like the quality of local tertiary education [or the lack thereof], the statistical truth remains — to most people, going overseas is a luxury. 

And yet, year after year, almost immediately after the release of the names of scholarship recipients for the year's cycle, some of the loudest and most indignant complaints habitually come from the parents whose children have been offered a local instead of an overseas scholarship. 

The most alarming thing is that we are also making the fatal mistake of overlooking the simple nature of financial aid — it is both common knowledge and common sense that where free money is concerned, demand will invariably outweigh supply, often by enormous proportions.

Funding, especially for an expensive overseas education, is very limited and competition is stiff. The Khazanah-Cambridge Scholarship Programme is an apt example — this year, 98 Cambridge offer-holders had to vie for a measly three places. 

As such, to take on the view that one has the right to a scholarship funding one's tertiary studies overseas is not only selfish, it also means subscribing to a very warped definition of "rights".

If one Cambridge offer-holder who worked really hard is entitled to having his studies sponsored, how is one to justify denying any of the other 97 candidates the same entitlement? 

Yes, your child had to slog in front of his books and community projects day and night in order to secure an offer from Cambridge University, but guess what, so did the other 97 candidates. 

Having a right to something does not mean gaining something directly at the expense of others who fit the minimum application requirements as much as you do. The concepts of rights and entitlement just do not work that way. 

The second issue relates to a compelling argument which has been raised to justify the lawsuit. Khazanah Nasional is a government-linked company, and so it owes certain duties to the public. There is a duty to be transparent, and a duty to handle and manage its funds appropriately.

In the case of awarding scholarships, such financial aid should ideally only be given to the best candidates without regard to race or "connections". 

This is undeniably true, and I am all for supporting this. 

It is, however, worth noting that care should be taken to avoid tumbling down a slippery slope. 

It is all fine and dandy to demand for transparency as a whole, but exactly how transparent is transparent? Yayasan Khazanah has already issued a public statement to clarify its selection procedures.

How specific do we want the information to be before we can be satisfied? Would a list of criteria be sufficient or are we looking for a detailed blow-by-blow of the selection process? There appears to be no clear consensus to this question. 

We should also be mindful of the thin line between seeking transparency and seeking to impose our own personal views on what the policies should be. 

Yes, we may request for the selection criteria to be revealed, but what happens if or when we don't agree with them? What then? To date, we are still unable to agree on whether scholarships should be given to students who deserve them as opposed to those who need funding, and as far as the merits vs needs debate is concerned, the opposing sides are more or less evenly split. 

What happens if it transpires that Yayasan Khazanah's selection policy favours one particular factor over another? Do we then have the right to attempt to sue Yayasan Khazanah for subjective "unfairness"? How far do, and should, we go in this? 

I am not suggesting that we have gotten this far, but looking at where we are right now, it is certainly not impossible to stray down this path if we are not wary enough of the slippery slope and the boundaries we must toe. 

The quest for transparency in public bodies is indeed admirable and should be supported, but as already discussed above, there are a couple of issues worth pondering over before we press with this any further. 

We need to remind ourselves of the bigger picture — that scholarships are, by their very nature, a privilege, and not a right. 

We also need to be clear on what we actually want when we seek more clarification, but most importantly, we need to mind the fine line between demanding for transparency and attempting to usurp a public body's job in making executive policy decisions.

* Yizhen has just completed her undergraduate law degree at the University of Oxford.

* The views expressed here are the personal opinion of the columnist.

Kredit: http://www.themalaysianinsider.com

The Malaysian Insider :: Bahasa

0 ulasan
Klik GAMBAR Dibawah Untuk Lebih Info
Sumber Asal Berita :-

The Malaysian Insider :: Bahasa


Ibu empat anak parah terminum racun semut disangka sirap pandan

Posted: 06 Sep 2011 02:50 AM PDT

KOTA BARU, 6 Sept – Seorang wanita dimasukkan ke Hospital Raja Perempuan Zainab II selepas terminum racun semut yang disangkanya sirap yang dibancuh suaminya di rumah mereka di Kampung Rambutan Rendang di sini hari ini.

Norhafiza Badli Afendi, 27, mengalami kekejangan dan mulut berbuih selepas terminum racun itu pukul 11 pagi tadi.

Suaminya, Mohd Din Yusof, 27, berkata sebelum itu dia membancuh racun semut itu yang berwarna hijau dan memasukkannya dalam gelas dan diletakkan di atas meja makan.

"Saya keluar bagi mengambil pam penyembur racun dan tidak sangka isteri saya yang menyangka ia sejenis sirap pandan telah meminumnya ketika saya keluar sebentar itu.

"Isteri saya sukar bercakap dan terketar-ketar selepas meminumnya. Keadaan dia sekarang sukar untuk bercakap dan darah mengalir dari mulut dia," kata Mohd Din dipetik Bernama Online.

Pasangan itu mempunyai empat anak, dua daripadanya sudah bersekolah.

Mohd Din berkata bahawa sebelum ini racun itu tidak dibancuh menggunakan air dan dia hanya menabur serbuk racun yang dibeli di pasar malam itu di seluruh kawasan rumah.

"Tapi kali ini saya rasa nak guna air dan menyembur pula sebab sebelum ini nampak tidak berkesan," katanya.

Khairy: Kelantan batal tawaran, tapi saya tetap tunggu Mat Sabu

Posted: 06 Sep 2011 02:44 AM PDT

KUALA LUMPUR, 6 Sept – Ketua Pemuda Umno Khairy Jamaluddin berkata, bukan beliau yang hendak sangat berdebat mengenai kontroversi kenyataan berkenaan tragedi Bukit Kepong, tetapi dijemput oleh kerajaan negeri Kelantan untuk menjayakan program mereka.

Sehubungan itu kata Khairy (gambar), beliau tetap menanti kemunculan Mohamad Sabu, yang merupakan punca kontroversi semasa, untuk berdebat dengannya walaupun sudah ada tiga tawaran lain sekarang manakala timbalan presiden PAS itu sendiri enggan berhadapan dengannya.

"Bukan saya yang nak, tapi saya dijemput asalnya untuk debat Mat Sabu (Mohamad Sabu) oleh kerajaan Kelantan," katanya.

Khairy yang semalam menyifatkan Mohamad sebagai bacul dan tidak bermaruah selepas tidak mahu berdebat denganya juga berkata, beliau sudah menganggap debat yang hendak diadakan tidak akan menjadi kenyataan.

"Saya anggap tiada debat akan berlaku sebab tawaran asal itu ditarik balik oleh PAS sendiri," katanya lagi.

Khairy memberikan penjelasan terperinci dalam 12 mesej yang dihantar menerusi Twitter sekitar 4.30 hingga 5 petang tadi.

Dua jam sebelum itu, Pemuda PAS pusat menghantar surat jemputan untuk berdebat dengan Pemuda Umno.

Surat yang dialamatkan kepada Khairy diserahkan oleh Setiausaha Pemuda PAS Khairul Faizi Ahmad Kamil kepada Penolong Setiausaha Pemuda Umno Datuk Megat Firdouz Megat Junid di ibu negara.

"Sekadar memberi penjelasan dan perkembangan terkini tentang isu debat... semua ini bermula bila saya dijemput oleh kerajaan Kelantan untuk debat dengan Mat Sabu.

"Saya setuju dengan jemputan tersebut. Pengajur pernah jemput saya debat (dengan Exco Kerajan Negeri Kelantan, Datuk Paduka) Husam Musa beberapa tahun lepas," kata Khairy merujuk kepada wacana yang berlangsung di Kota Baru.

Khairy juga berkata Mohamad yang tidak mahu "berdebat (dengan) saya dan menolak perkara ini kepada Pemuda PAS."

Khairy menambah, kerajaan Kelantan juga memaklumkan kepadanya bahawa PAS pusat tidak membenarkan Mohamad debat dengannya.

Dalam kenyataan kepada The Malaysian Insider pagi tadi, Ketua Penerangan PAS Datuk Tuan Ibrahim Tuan Man berkata beliau menyokong pendirian Mohamad tidak mahu berdebat dengan Khairy.

"Sekarang tawaran (Ahli Parlimen Shah Alam) YB Khalid Samad pula. Jadi, sekarang Mat Sabu tolak ke (kepada) Pemuda PAS Johor, Pemuda PAS pusat pun hantar surat debat saya dan YB Khalid Samad ditawarkan. Tiga tawaran!" kata Khairy yang juga Ahli Parlimen Rembau.

Khalid juga merupakan ahli jawatankuasa kerja PAS pusat dan Yang Dipertua PAS Shah Alam.

Bagaimanapun kata Khairy, bagi beliau yang penting Mohamad sebab beliau adalah punca kepada kontroversi semasa.

"Mereka nak tawar orang lain tak pa, tapi asal KJ (Khairy) melawan Mat Sabu," katanya lagi.

Mengenai debat dengan Ketua Pemuda PAS Nasrudin Hassan dan Khalid, Khairy berkata, beliau sudah pun 'debat' atau 'berforum' dengan kedua-dua mereka masa dulu tentang pelbagai isu.

"Jadi, tak timbul isu saya tak nak berdepan dengan mereka. Perkara itu sudah berlaku. Lawan (Nasrudin) Tantawi di Sinar (Harian) dirakam dan ada di YouTube.

"Kali ini saya hanya mahu debat dengan Mat Sabu. Sebab dia punca kontroversi dan itu juga jemputan asal dari kerajaan PAS Kelantan," katanya.

Kata Khairy, beliau tetap akan menanti kehadiran Mohamad dan sama ada "dia setuju atau tak setuju, saya tetap bersedia."

Kredit: http://www.themalaysianinsider.com
 

Malaysia Insider Online

Copyright 2010 All Rights Reserved