Ahad, 16 Mac 2014

The Malaysian Insider :: Food

0 ulasan
Klik GAMBAR Dibawah Untuk Lebih Info
Sumber Asal Berita :-

The Malaysian Insider :: Food


Hong Kong craft beer revolution hops along

Posted: 16 Mar 2014 07:50 PM PDT

March 17, 2014

Rohit Dugar from India opened his own microbrewery, Young Master Ales late in 2013. In doing so he joined a growing number of ‘craft’ beer makers – small volume, independent breweries – aiming to save Hong Kong from drowning in a sea of industrial, imported lager. – AFP pic, March 17, 2014.Rohit Dugar from India opened his own microbrewery, Young Master Ales late in 2013. In doing so he joined a growing number of 'craft' beer makers – small volume, independent breweries – aiming to save Hong Kong from drowning in a sea of industrial, imported lager. – AFP pic, March 17, 2014.Rohit Dugar moved to Hong Kong from New York three years ago and quickly realised that he didn't like any of the beer there. So he decided to make his own.

He quit his job at Goldman Sachs and late last year opened his own microbrewery, Young Master Ales.

In doing so, the 34-year-old from New Delhi and his brew master partner Ulrich Altbauer joined a growing number of "craft" beer makers – small volume, independent breweries – aiming to save Hong Kong from drowning in a sea of industrial, imported lager.

"We're trying to discover what Hong Kong's brewing culture should be like," said Dugar, pulling beers for a line-up of punters at his stall on an overcast afternoon at Hong Kong's Beertopia craft beer festival – an event that aims to bring local and regional breweries to a wider audience.

"We want to do a few classic styles, do them well and earn our stripes as a brewery. As long as we keep doing that the local beer scene will grow," said Dugar.

"When people realise that something has potential, things tend to move quickly here in Hong Kong."

Young Master Ales currently produces 15,000 litres per month. Its seven beers range from a 5.0% "Classic" amber pale ale to an 11.5% brew aged for six months in a whisky barrel, giving it complex rye, oak and malt notes.

The grain is imported from Germany, while the hops come from Australia, New Zealand and the United States. Dugar says he also uses locally sourced herbs and spices.

Young Master is among four new brewing operations to start up business in Hong Kong in the past year, with each one aiming to develop world-class beers that speak to their home city, while an increasing number of bars are dedicating taps usually dominated by mainstream beers to more artisanal tipples.

Fed up

In its third year, the Beertopia event is seen as a barometer for a growing local micro brewing industry that has been spurred on by Hong Kong's elimination in 2008 of duty on wine and beer.

The city's high-end bars and buzz-worthy restaurants are increasingly paying attention as local beer makers try to convince them to look beyond the big industrial brands.

"Beer doesn't have to be yellow, fizzy and bitter," said Jonathan So, who set up the Beertopia event in 2012.

"High-end restaurants are asking themselves that if they are selling high-quality ingredients, why then serve supermarket beer?"

Estimated to make up four to five percent of beer sales globally, craft beer has steadily been gaining traction around the world.

The United States leads the way with around 2,700 craft breweries, which have been credited with helping prevent stagnation in its otherwise flat market dominated by giants such as Belgium's Anheuser-Busch InBev, best known for perennial best-seller Budweiser, Britain's SABMiller and Canada's Molson Coors.

In Asia, Japan is home to more than 200 microbreweries, and a scene is growing in South Korea too, while Singapore boasts 12 breweries of its own.

Now momentum in Hong Kong is gathering, with more brewers getting involved.

New Empire Brewery, run by ex-British Navy chef Dan Rybinski and Troy Foo, opened in the city earlier this year.

"We want to be at the centre of the craft beer revolution that's happening here," said Rybinski, whose motive for starting his own brewery matches that of Dugar – a lack of decent local beer.

"A lot of people are fed up drinking the same old things and paying what they do for it here. They deserve a high-quality product."

At Beertopia, New Empire was serving two house ales – a citrus pale ale perfectly suited to Hong Kong's hot summer days, and an American IPA (India Pale Ale) – traditionally a vibrant, hoppy British beer but this time brewed with American hops.

Why ship it halfway around the world?

The biggest challenges for brewers in Hong Kong are high property and operational costs as well as a general lack of space.

"It's not just about high rents," said Dugar, whose brewery is based in an old industrial estate on Hong Kong Island.

"It's also about how to fit brewing equipment which tends to be taller than the ceiling heights we have. Floor loading in some older buildings is not suitable. There's a whole host of problems."

Another player is Hong Kong Beer Company, one of the city's older breweries. First set up in 1995, it closed down before being bought and reopened last year by the founders of Singapore's Brewerkz pub.

"It's amazing how everything has bubbled up in the last year," said Devin Otto Kimble, a Hong Kong Beer Co. director.

He says that drinkers are increasingly quality-conscious and are prepared to pay more for craft beer, whose complex method is reflected in its higher prices.

"You might drink a $100 bottle of wine so why drink really cheap beer?

"Beer is 95 percent water, so why ship it halfway around the world? The British always say that you shouldn't take beer any further than a horse can go in a day, and I think that's true." – AFP, March 17, 2014.

Hong Kong craft beer revolution hops along

Posted: 16 Mar 2014 07:50 PM PDT

March 17, 2014

Rohit Dugar from India opened his own microbrewery, Young Master Ales late in 2013. In doing so he joined a growing number of ‘craft’ beer makers – small volume, independent breweries – aiming to save Hong Kong from drowning in a sea of industrial, imported lager. – AFP pic, March 17, 2014.Rohit Dugar from India opened his own microbrewery, Young Master Ales late in 2013. In doing so he joined a growing number of 'craft' beer makers – small volume, independent breweries – aiming to save Hong Kong from drowning in a sea of industrial, imported lager. – AFP pic, March 17, 2014.Rohit Dugar moved to Hong Kong from New York three years ago and quickly realised that he didn't like any of the beer there. So he decided to make his own.

He quit his job at Goldman Sachs and late last year opened his own microbrewery, Young Master Ales.

In doing so, the 34-year-old from New Delhi and his brew master partner Ulrich Altbauer joined a growing number of "craft" beer makers – small volume, independent breweries – aiming to save Hong Kong from drowning in a sea of industrial, imported lager.

"We're trying to discover what Hong Kong's brewing culture should be like," said Dugar, pulling beers for a line-up of punters at his stall on an overcast afternoon at Hong Kong's Beertopia craft beer festival – an event that aims to bring local and regional breweries to a wider audience.

"We want to do a few classic styles, do them well and earn our stripes as a brewery. As long as we keep doing that the local beer scene will grow," said Dugar.

"When people realise that something has potential, things tend to move quickly here in Hong Kong."

Young Master Ales currently produces 15,000 litres per month. Its seven beers range from a 5.0% "Classic" amber pale ale to an 11.5% brew aged for six months in a whisky barrel, giving it complex rye, oak and malt notes.

The grain is imported from Germany, while the hops come from Australia, New Zealand and the United States. Dugar says he also uses locally sourced herbs and spices.

Young Master is among four new brewing operations to start up business in Hong Kong in the past year, with each one aiming to develop world-class beers that speak to their home city, while an increasing number of bars are dedicating taps usually dominated by mainstream beers to more artisanal tipples.

Fed up

In its third year, the Beertopia event is seen as a barometer for a growing local micro brewing industry that has been spurred on by Hong Kong's elimination in 2008 of duty on wine and beer.

The city's high-end bars and buzz-worthy restaurants are increasingly paying attention as local beer makers try to convince them to look beyond the big industrial brands.

"Beer doesn't have to be yellow, fizzy and bitter," said Jonathan So, who set up the Beertopia event in 2012.

"High-end restaurants are asking themselves that if they are selling high-quality ingredients, why then serve supermarket beer?"

Estimated to make up four to five percent of beer sales globally, craft beer has steadily been gaining traction around the world.

The United States leads the way with around 2,700 craft breweries, which have been credited with helping prevent stagnation in its otherwise flat market dominated by giants such as Belgium's Anheuser-Busch InBev, best known for perennial best-seller Budweiser, Britain's SABMiller and Canada's Molson Coors.

In Asia, Japan is home to more than 200 microbreweries, and a scene is growing in South Korea too, while Singapore boasts 12 breweries of its own.

Now momentum in Hong Kong is gathering, with more brewers getting involved.

New Empire Brewery, run by ex-British Navy chef Dan Rybinski and Troy Foo, opened in the city earlier this year.

"We want to be at the centre of the craft beer revolution that's happening here," said Rybinski, whose motive for starting his own brewery matches that of Dugar – a lack of decent local beer.

"A lot of people are fed up drinking the same old things and paying what they do for it here. They deserve a high-quality product."

At Beertopia, New Empire was serving two house ales – a citrus pale ale perfectly suited to Hong Kong's hot summer days, and an American IPA (India Pale Ale) – traditionally a vibrant, hoppy British beer but this time brewed with American hops.

Why ship it halfway around the world?

The biggest challenges for brewers in Hong Kong are high property and operational costs as well as a general lack of space.

"It's not just about high rents," said Dugar, whose brewery is based in an old industrial estate on Hong Kong Island.

"It's also about how to fit brewing equipment which tends to be taller than the ceiling heights we have. Floor loading in some older buildings is not suitable. There's a whole host of problems."

Another player is Hong Kong Beer Company, one of the city's older breweries. First set up in 1995, it closed down before being bought and reopened last year by the founders of Singapore's Brewerkz pub.

"It's amazing how everything has bubbled up in the last year," said Devin Otto Kimble, a Hong Kong Beer Co. director.

He says that drinkers are increasingly quality-conscious and are prepared to pay more for craft beer, whose complex method is reflected in its higher prices.

"You might drink a $100 bottle of wine so why drink really cheap beer?

"Beer is 95 percent water, so why ship it halfway around the world? The British always say that you shouldn't take beer any further than a horse can go in a day, and I think that's true." – AFP, March 17, 2014.

Kredit: http://www.themalaysianinsider.com

The Malaysian Insider :: Sports

0 ulasan
Klik GAMBAR Dibawah Untuk Lebih Info
Sumber Asal Berita :-

The Malaysian Insider :: Sports


Red Bull’s Ricciardo excluded from home Australian F1

Posted: 16 Mar 2014 07:29 AM PDT

March 16, 2014

Red Bull's Daniel Ricciardo (pic) was stripped of his first Formula One podium finish at his home Australian Grand Prix on Sunday after his car was found to have broken fuel regulations, the governing FIA said.

The decision meant McLaren's Danish rookie Kevin Magnussen moved up from third to second, with team mate Jenson Button taking third place.

Red Bull said they had notified the governing body immediately of their intention to appeal.

"Inconsistencies with the FIA fuel flow meter have been prevalent all weekend up and down the pit lane," the team said. "The Team and Renault are confident the fuel supplied to the engine is in full compliance with the regulations." – Reuters, March 16, 2014

Red Bull’s Ricciardo excluded from home Australian F1

Posted: 16 Mar 2014 07:29 AM PDT

March 16, 2014

Red Bull's Daniel Ricciardo (pic) was stripped of his first Formula One podium finish at his home Australian Grand Prix on Sunday after his car was found to have broken fuel regulations, the governing FIA said.

The decision meant McLaren's Danish rookie Kevin Magnussen moved up from third to second, with team mate Jenson Button taking third place.

Red Bull said they had notified the governing body immediately of their intention to appeal.

"Inconsistencies with the FIA fuel flow meter have been prevalent all weekend up and down the pit lane," the team said. "The Team and Renault are confident the fuel supplied to the engine is in full compliance with the regulations." – Reuters, March 16, 2014

Kredit: http://www.themalaysianinsider.com

The Malaysian Insider :: Features

0 ulasan
Klik GAMBAR Dibawah Untuk Lebih Info
Sumber Asal Berita :-

The Malaysian Insider :: Features


Coal, gas or nuclear? Power-hungry South Africa must decide soon

Posted: 16 Mar 2014 01:38 AM PDT

March 16, 2014

While South Africa's infrastructure is the envy of the region, nearly a quarter of its power generation capacity currently is out of action due to maintenance. – The Malaysian Insider pic, March 16, 2014While South Africa's infrastructure is the envy of the region, nearly a quarter of its power generation capacity currently is out of action due to maintenance. – The Malaysian Insider pic, March 16, 2014On paper, South Africa's long-term energy plans look solid, with coal, nuclear, gas and renewables all viable options.

But none are likely to prevent potentially crippling future power crunches in Africa's biggest economy unless a decision is made soon on when and how to add capacity to the grid.

South Africa's failure to invest in new power plants nearly two decades ago meant it paid dearly in 2008 when the grid nearly collapsed, leading to power cuts that cost the economy billions of rand in lost output and dented investor confidence.

State-owned power utility Eskom is scrambling to finish new power plants, including Medupi and Kusile, massive coal-fired outfits with a combined capacity of about 9,500 megawatts (MW).

But they are still several years away from completion, and in the interim Eskom will be battling to keep the lights on, nursing its fleet of ageing generating units and hoping breakdowns do not reduce reserve margins to critical levels.

The utility has declared four power "emergencies" since November and earlier this month imposed rolling blackouts, known locally as "load shedding", for the first time in six years.

Although they lasted only a day, the blackouts came at a bad time for President Jacob Zuma and his governing African National Congress (ANC) two months before a national election. The ANC is expected to win but its majority is likely to be reduced by public anger over corruption scandals and deficient delivery of public services in many poor black townships.

The worst is not over, says Eskom, which provides 95% of South Africa's electricity and has a total generation capacity of 42,000 MW. This is slightly less than Turkey but almost 10 times more than Nigeria, sub-saharan Africa's second biggest economy and top oil producer.

Although South Africa's infrastructure is generally the envy of Africa, at the moment nearly a quarter of its power generation capacity is out of action, mainly for maintenance.

The first power from Medupi, about 800 MW, is expected in the second half of this year. Eskom admits this will not prevent more blackouts should the system come under further strain.

Any event leading to a loss of more than 1,500 MW could have a significant impact on the grid, Eskom said.

"Ten years to fix"

Eskom chief executive Brian Dames said South Africa was still feeling the repercussions of the ANC government's decision not to build new plants when asked by the utility to do so in 1998.

Construction of Medupi only started in 2007 and has been plagued by delays related to design flaws and labour unrest.

"It will take 10 years to fix the 1998 problem," said Dames, who steps down at the end of this month.

In its 20-year Integrated Resource Plan (IRP), running up to 2030, the government says coal, nuclear, hydro, shale gas and renewable energy are all options to beef up power supply.

And after the 2008 debacle, the government realises it could pay a heavy price if it does not decide in time on the next phase of power construction when Medupi and Kusile are complete.

"We are working around the clock to arrive at decisions quickly," Public Enterprises Minister Malusi Gigaba said.

The IRP is revised every two years, the latest revision being last year. Cabinet has yet to approve the updated plan which proposes a delay in construction of more nuclear power plants and a focus instead on coal, hydro and gas.

Eskom's problems are compounded by increasing maintenance needs at its decades-old plants, and unplanned outages.

It also faces challenges relating to the quality of coal fed into its power stations. The recent blackouts were imposed after torrential rain soaked coal stockpiles and the coal could not be fed properly into the system.

"I don't think there is nearly enough attention being given to the supply of coal for Eskom. That's an area government needs to do more work on," said Mike Rossouw, chairman of the Energy Intensive Users Group, which represents heavy power users such as mines and factories.

Eskom's coal stockpiles are mostly kept in the open, in part because of the high cost of storage, and so are prone to damage from heavy rain. Storage bunkers are available but not enough to protect all the coal and the problem is compounded by most of Eskom's supply coming from exposed open-pit mines.

Diversify the energy mix

Eskom generates most of its electricity from coal-fired plants but also has one nuclear plant, gas turbines, hydro-electric and wind facilities. Coal is likely to remain the main feed stock for base-load power, given that South Africa is a major producer and exporter of coal.

To diversify its energy sources and reduce its reliance on coal plants, South Africa started three years ago to procure renewable power from independent producers.

To date, the government has signed off on 64 renewable energy projects with a combined capacity of 3,850 MW. Eskom said 19 projects had been connected to the grid to date.

Analysts say more needs to be done to allow private players in – and not just for renewable energy, which is struggling to produce power at rates Eskom deems competitive with coal.

"The industry is by far not deregulated enough. We need to have more participants in base-load generation in South Africa," said Cornelis van der Waal, an energy analyst at consultancy Frost & Sullivan.

"Whether that base load is coal, nuclear, gas or hydro, let's leave that to the industry to decide who can supply the most reliable electricity at the best rate." – Reuters, March 16, 2014

Coal, Gas or Nuclear? Power-hungry South Africa must decide now

Posted: 15 Mar 2014 01:46 AM PDT

[unable to retrieve full-text content]​On paper, South Africa's long-term energy plans look solid, with coal, nuclear, gas and renewables all viable options.But none are likely to prevent potentially crippling future power crunches in Africa's biggest economy unless a decision is made soon on when and how to add capacity to the grid.South Africa's failure to invest in new power...
    






Kredit: http://www.themalaysianinsider.com

The Malaysian Insider :: Opinion

0 ulasan
Klik GAMBAR Dibawah Untuk Lebih Info
Sumber Asal Berita :-

The Malaysian Insider :: Opinion


Lessons from MH370

Posted: 15 Mar 2014 05:43 PM PDT

March 16, 2014

Dr Dzulkefly Ahmad is a member of the PAS central working committee and ex-MP of Kuala Selangor.

That the mysterious disappearance of MH370 has plunged the Malaysia into serious disrepute is an understatement. The longest-serving government the world ever had is truly under siege.

In no time, the true capability of the government is brought to the fore.

For once perhaps, the Malaysian opposition coalition, Pakatan Rakyat, ceases to be envious of the position of the Barisan Nasional government.

Arguably, this crisis has no precedence and it is unfair to compare it with one. With no wreckage, no debris, no trace of the aircraft or the people, this crisis has become the most baffling in modern aviation.

With 227 passengers from 14 nationalities and 12 crew members onboard the Boeing 777-200ER, managing a global crisis of such a magnitude is surely a daunting task.

Perchance the "crisis management team", if ever there were one from the outset, could have been oblivious of this fact when the saga begun.

Nay, in all honesty, this writer believed that even the prime minister wasn't mindful of the far-reaching consequences of not managing well this calamity.

The heightening pressure and demand from aviation experts for more transparency must be taxing enough. Worse still is to endure the intensifying clamour for more information, especially from Beijing and elsewhere, from anxious and despairing family members.

It suddenly dawned on the prime minister that his and his cabinet's credibility is at stake.

He should have been more than mindful that he couldn't rely on his cousin in managing such gruelling times. No disputing the fact that he is acting transport minister though. But that alone doesn't entitle one to helm and direct a crisis team especially if it is beyond our shore.

Never mind the many early chaotic statements issued by the lacklustre director-general of the Department of Civil Aviation, Datuk Azharuddin Abdul Rahman, about passengers, their baggage and of stolen passports, which oftentimes were either contradicted or refuted by officials from Malaysia Airlines, within the first 48 hours.

This, nonetheless, is a normal observation in such crises, as opined by many experts.

Never mind the inspector-general of police, who while not wanting to be seen aloof or oblivious of the emerging crisis, has also undoubtedly exacerbated the already confused state. No one would have faulted him as more fingers were pointed at the home minister, who was quick to blame others and absolve himself.

With 14 nations engaged in the search and rescue (SAR) mission, it has turned to be almost like a "free-for-all". Rumours, speculations and theories abound and debates ensued unabated, both offline, that is, in print, and in online media.

There were ostensibly more probing questions and sometimes commendable suggestions than there were information and undisputed answers. It almost degenerated to a circus.

As if these weren't enough to almost bring the nation, especially of its leaders to their knees, there were humiliating side-shows of the Raja Bomoh and his paraphernalia, including a "magic carpet".

I am not about to paraphrase all the more important issues worth pursuing.

Simply put, after a week of investigation, the crisis team is admitting that they are still looking at sabotage, with hijack still on the cards.

Incidentally, the United States said the shutdown of two communications systems on Malaysia Airlines flight MH370 occurred separately. The data reporting system was shut down at 1.07am, while the transponder was shut down at 1.21am on Saturday. The transponder is a device that transmits location and altitude of a plane.

This could very well indicate that it may have been a deliberate manual act, hence strengthening the thesis of a deliberate human intervention and quite unlikely of an accident or a malfunction.

Be that as it may, what this aims to highlight is the fact of the urgency to have a "crisis management team" in place.

Granted, the Malaysian government has again stressed that the search and rescue (SAR) operations for Boeing 77-200 plane was headed by Azharuddin.

It is extremely regrettable that a former chief of the United States National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) had described that handling of the crisis as the "worst" the industry had seen in recent time. The observation of its former managing director Peter Goelz was unfortunately shared by other aviation experts.

Referring to the Convention on International Air Transportation, under the International Civil Aviation Organisation (ICAO), of which Malaysia was a signatory, Goezl was clearly alluding to the standard operating procedure of managing such crisis.

Among others, the treaty spells out outlines of the investigation process, the involvement of other related countries and dispersal of information.

Much to the chagrin of the minister in charge, who had always alleged that his team was compliant, it doesn't hurt our credibility further in humbling ourselves to take stock of all the advice.

Goelz said invoking the treaty would give Malaysia access to "a comprehensive network and structure" necessary to resolve the conundrum of the missing aircraft.

He similarly alleged that Malaysian authorities were refusing to do so owing to "national pride". Arguably it could very well be for some other strategic reasons. But was it justifiable?

Not wanting to necessarily agree with the assertion of these experts, it pays for the Malaysian government to take heed and revisit this crisis once this harrowing experience is over.

Sharing critical information, real time, like that of the primary (military) radar detecting a blip and photos of holders of false passport is the essence. More significantly perhaps, the minister disputed claims that the MH370 had flown for hours after losing contact.

But the latest military radar-tracking evidence suggests that the MH370 was deliberately flown across the peninsula towards the Andaman Islands. This strengthens the theory of sabotage or a hijack.

To paraphrase Steven Wallace, another aviation expert, the "best information" wasn't immediately presented to the "smartest people around". Could we have avoided the many "blunders"?

* This article was written before Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Razak's press conference yesterday.

* This is the personal opinion of the writer or publication and does not necessarily represent the views of The Malaysian Insider.

Lessons from MH370

Posted: 15 Mar 2014 05:43 PM PDT

March 16, 2014

Dr Dzulkefly Ahmad is a member of the PAS central working committee and ex-MP of Kuala Selangor.

That the mysterious disappearance of MH370 has plunged the Malaysia into serious disrepute is an understatement. The longest-serving government the world ever had is truly under siege.

In no time, the true capability of the government is brought to the fore.

For once perhaps, the Malaysian opposition coalition, Pakatan Rakyat, ceases to be envious of the position of the Barisan Nasional government.

Arguably, this crisis has no precedence and it is unfair to compare it with one. With no wreckage, no debris, no trace of the aircraft or the people, this crisis has become the most baffling in modern aviation.

With 227 passengers from 14 nationalities and 12 crew members onboard the Boeing 777-200ER, managing a global crisis of such a magnitude is surely a daunting task.

Perchance the "crisis management team", if ever there were one from the outset, could have been oblivious of this fact when the saga begun.

Nay, in all honesty, this writer believed that even the prime minister wasn't mindful of the far-reaching consequences of not managing well this calamity.

The heightening pressure and demand from aviation experts for more transparency must be taxing enough. Worse still is to endure the intensifying clamour for more information, especially from Beijing and elsewhere, from anxious and despairing family members.

It suddenly dawned on the prime minister that his and his cabinet's credibility is at stake.

He should have been more than mindful that he couldn't rely on his cousin in managing such gruelling times. No disputing the fact that he is acting transport minister though. But that alone doesn't entitle one to helm and direct a crisis team especially if it is beyond our shore.

Never mind the many early chaotic statements issued by the lacklustre director-general of the Department of Civil Aviation, Datuk Azharuddin Abdul Rahman, about passengers, their baggage and of stolen passports, which oftentimes were either contradicted or refuted by officials from Malaysia Airlines, within the first 48 hours.

This, nonetheless, is a normal observation in such crises, as opined by many experts.

Never mind the inspector-general of police, who while not wanting to be seen aloof or oblivious of the emerging crisis, has also undoubtedly exacerbated the already confused state. No one would have faulted him as more fingers were pointed at the home minister, who was quick to blame others and absolve himself.

With 14 nations engaged in the search and rescue (SAR) mission, it has turned to be almost like a "free-for-all". Rumours, speculations and theories abound and debates ensued unabated, both offline, that is, in print, and in online media.

There were ostensibly more probing questions and sometimes commendable suggestions than there were information and undisputed answers. It almost degenerated to a circus.

As if these weren't enough to almost bring the nation, especially of its leaders to their knees, there were humiliating side-shows of the Raja Bomoh and his paraphernalia, including a "magic carpet".

I am not about to paraphrase all the more important issues worth pursuing.

Simply put, after a week of investigation, the crisis team is admitting that they are still looking at sabotage, with hijack still on the cards.

Incidentally, the United States said the shutdown of two communications systems on Malaysia Airlines flight MH370 occurred separately. The data reporting system was shut down at 1.07am, while the transponder was shut down at 1.21am on Saturday. The transponder is a device that transmits location and altitude of a plane.

This could very well indicate that it may have been a deliberate manual act, hence strengthening the thesis of a deliberate human intervention and quite unlikely of an accident or a malfunction.

Be that as it may, what this aims to highlight is the fact of the urgency to have a "crisis management team" in place.

Granted, the Malaysian government has again stressed that the search and rescue (SAR) operations for Boeing 77-200 plane was headed by Azharuddin.

It is extremely regrettable that a former chief of the United States National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) had described that handling of the crisis as the "worst" the industry had seen in recent time. The observation of its former managing director Peter Goelz was unfortunately shared by other aviation experts.

Referring to the Convention on International Air Transportation, under the International Civil Aviation Organisation (ICAO), of which Malaysia was a signatory, Goezl was clearly alluding to the standard operating procedure of managing such crisis.

Among others, the treaty spells out outlines of the investigation process, the involvement of other related countries and dispersal of information.

Much to the chagrin of the minister in charge, who had always alleged that his team was compliant, it doesn't hurt our credibility further in humbling ourselves to take stock of all the advice.

Goelz said invoking the treaty would give Malaysia access to "a comprehensive network and structure" necessary to resolve the conundrum of the missing aircraft.

He similarly alleged that Malaysian authorities were refusing to do so owing to "national pride". Arguably it could very well be for some other strategic reasons. But was it justifiable?

Not wanting to necessarily agree with the assertion of these experts, it pays for the Malaysian government to take heed and revisit this crisis once this harrowing experience is over.

Sharing critical information, real time, like that of the primary (military) radar detecting a blip and photos of holders of false passport is the essence. More significantly perhaps, the minister disputed claims that the MH370 had flown for hours after losing contact.

But the latest military radar-tracking evidence suggests that the MH370 was deliberately flown across the peninsula towards the Andaman Islands. This strengthens the theory of sabotage or a hijack.

To paraphrase Steven Wallace, another aviation expert, the "best information" wasn't immediately presented to the "smartest people around". Could we have avoided the many "blunders"?

* This article was written before Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Razak's press conference yesterday.

* This is the personal opinion of the writer or publication and does not necessarily represent the views of The Malaysian Insider.

Kredit: http://www.themalaysianinsider.com
 

Malaysia Insider Online

Copyright 2010 All Rights Reserved