Isnin, 5 Mei 2014

The Malaysian Insider :: Food

0 ulasan
Klik GAMBAR Dibawah Untuk Lebih Info
Sumber Asal Berita :-

The Malaysian Insider :: Food


Gratuities ‘not expected’ as some US restaurants forgo tips

Posted: 05 May 2014 05:24 PM PDT

May 06, 2014

Tipping can vary wildly from guest to guest – and not always because of the quality of the table service. – AFP/Relaxnews pic, May 6, 2014.Tipping can vary wildly from guest to guest – and not always because of the quality of the table service. – AFP/Relaxnews pic, May 6, 2014.In the United States, customers are expected to add an extra 10 to 20% to their tab at the end of a meal – but increasingly restaurants are forgoing these tips.

Leaving a gratuity is de rigueur when dining out because pay for restaurant servers is so low.

While the US federal minimum wage is US$7.25 (RM23.58) an hour, wait staff can legally be paid as little as US$2.13 in some places. In New York, one of the most expensive US cities, salaries for waiters start at US$5.00 per hour.

For wait staff, tips help bolster pay in line with other restaurant workers who don't receive gratuities.

However there is a new trend: Riki Restaurant in New York is one of a growing number of establishments eliminating tips by taking the unusual step of paying their staff higher wages.

"Riki Restaurant is now a non-tipping establishment," read notices at the popular Japanese eatery. "Tipping is not required nor expected."

The no-tip policy is especially being adopted by upscale restaurants, said Michael Lynn, a professor at Cornell University's School of Hotel Administration.

Folding tips into the meal tab protects waiters from being shortchanged by the occasional tight-fisted diner, said Lynn, who specialises in issues related to marketing and consumer behaviour.

It's seen as an issue of equity, as restaurants attempt "to equalise the pay between the front and the back of the house", he said.

A downside is the sticker shock that patrons sometimes suffer when browsing through menus that have tips factored into the prices.

"American customers tend to not think of the tip as an expense, and they don't really factor that into their assessment of how expensive a restaurant is," Lynn said.

"It makes a restaurant look more expensive than a restaurant that has 15% lower prices, but expects tips."

Gabriel Frem, owner of the upscale Brand 158 restaurant in the Los Angeles suburb of Glendale, also sees his establishment's no-tipping policy as a way to protect staff from the whims of diners.

"We interview and hire our employees, not the guest, and we expect to pay them, and be responsible for their actions," he said.

"If they do great, we keep them, and if they don't, we let them go.

"We don't want their pay to be at the mercy of a guest's random calculation, based on unpredictable factors."

As it turns out, tipping can vary wildly from guest to guest – and not always because of the quality of the table service.

Some patrons withhold tips because they feel the server was not sufficiently cheerful ("I don't like her smile").

Others do so because they didn't particularly care for the food – even if a meal's preparation is not under the control of the wait staff.

It's also a problem, Frem said, if workers don't know how much income they can count on from week to week.

"We want to ensure that they can pay their bills," he said.

Other managers say greater pay security in tip-less restaurant reduces turnover and improves morale.

The tipless restaurant is still a long way from becoming the norm, but some New Yorkers are beginning to warm to the idea.

"At first, I really thought that if a waiter was rude, I would want my discontent to be reflected in their tip," said Noel Warren, a young New Yorker who dines out at least twice a week.

"But then I thought, why would a waiter be disrespectful in the first place? Probably because he or she has lost faith that customers are going to tip well – so why put in any effort?"

Warren mused that it might in fact be fairer to take the decision about tips out of the fickle hands of restaurant patrons – which might even improve the table service that patrons.

"If they were properly compensated for their work, they might treat their customers better," Warren said. – AFP/Relaxnews, May 6, 2014.

Why coffee may be good for your eyes

Posted: 05 May 2014 05:00 PM PDT

[unable to retrieve full-text content]A coffee a day could help keep eye diseases at bay. That’s according to a joint study out of South Korea and the US, which concluded that powerful antioxidants found in coffee can play a role in preventing age-related eye diseases and the degeneration of eyesight. For their research, scientists looked at the impact of chlorogenic acid or...






Kredit: http://www.themalaysianinsider.com

The Malaysian Insider :: Sports

0 ulasan
Klik GAMBAR Dibawah Untuk Lebih Info
Sumber Asal Berita :-

The Malaysian Insider :: Sports


Spurs rout Mavs to set up clash with Trail Blazers

Posted: 05 May 2014 05:53 AM PDT

May 05, 2014

San Antonio Spurs forward Tim Duncan (21) dives to save the ball against the Dallas Mavericks in game seven of the first round of the 2014 NBA Playoffs at AT&T Center yesterday. – Reuters pic, May 5, 2014.San Antonio Spurs forward Tim Duncan (21) dives to save the ball against the Dallas Mavericks in game seven of the first round of the 2014 NBA Playoffs at AT&T Center yesterday. – Reuters pic, May 5, 2014.The San Antonio Spurs ended a hard-fought first-round series in emphatic style yesterday, routing the Dallas Mavericks 119-96 to advance in the NBA playoffs.

The Spurs, top seeds in the Western Conference, were pushed to a decisive seventh game by the eighth-seeded Mavs, but with their season on the line responded with the runaway win that gave them a four-games-to-three triumph in the first-round series.

"I think our best game was tonight," Spurs coach Gregg Popovich said of his team that had led the league in the regular season with 62 victories.

"We played very, very well, and I think it was one our best games of the year."

Tony Parker scored 24 of his 32 points in a first half, when San Antonio connected on a sizzling 68.4% of their shots from the field to build a comfortable cushion.

"We have a lot of respect for Dallas, they're a great team," Parker said. "They made it very hard on us. The whole series it was a hard fight."

Manu Ginobili finished with 20 points, five assists and six steals and Danny Green added 16 points for the Spurs, who will host the Portland Trail Blazers tomorrow in game one of their second-round series.

"I think our movement was good today and I think we're getting back to playing Spurs basketball," Parker said. "We're going to need it against Portland, they're a very good team."

The Mavericks were trying to become just the sixth number eight seed to knock off a top seed.

But yesterday they struggled offensively, with Dirk Nowitzki's 22 points leading the way and Devin Harris contributing 17 points off the bench.

Monta Ellis, who had averaged 24 points over the previous five games, contributed only 12 points on 3-of-11 shooting.

Nowitzki opened the scoring with a jump shot, but San Antonio promptly won 18 of the next 23 points and never looked back.

Dallas, who trailed 46-68 at halftime, opened the second half with back-to-back three-pointers.

The Mavericks cut the lead to 14 late in the third quarter, but San Antonio closed out the period on a 14-5 scoring run.

"We got hit by a tidal wave early," said Dallas coach Rick Carlisle. "They had their best game today. They're the best of the best, and they've been great for a long time. They've got a great chance, obviously."

The Mavericks haven't made it out of the first round since beating the Miami Heat for the NBA crown three years ago.

The game was the last of a record five game sevens in the opening round of the playoffs.

The total already matches the NBA record for the most seventh games in all rounds in any playoff year. – AFP, May 5, 2014.

Suarez named England’s Footballer of the Year

Posted: 05 May 2014 04:31 AM PDT

May 05, 2014

Liverpool captain Steven Gerrard (right) hugs teammate Luis Suarez after winning their English Premier League match against Norwich City at Carrow Road in Norwich April 20, 2014. – Reuters pic, May 5, 2014.Liverpool captain Steven Gerrard (right) hugs teammate Luis Suarez after winning their English Premier League match against Norwich City at Carrow Road in Norwich April 20, 2014. – Reuters pic, May 5, 2014.Liverpool striker Luis Suarez was named England's Footballer of the Year by the Football Writers' Association (FWA) today, completing an award double after taking the Professional Footballers' Association (PFA) accolade last month.

The 27-year-old Uruguayan finished ahead of team mate Steven Gerrard and Yaya Toure of Manchester City in the poll.

The honours come after he missed the first five league games of the season when he was serving the remainder of a 10-match ban imposed for biting Chelsea's Branislav Ivanovic last April. – Reuters, May 5, 2014.

Kredit: http://www.themalaysianinsider.com

The Malaysian Insider :: Showbiz

0 ulasan
Klik GAMBAR Dibawah Untuk Lebih Info
Sumber Asal Berita :-

The Malaysian Insider :: Showbiz


‘Spider-Man 2’ leaps to box office top

Posted: 04 May 2014 07:11 PM PDT

May 05, 2014

"The Amazing Spider-Man 2" sprang to the top of the North American box office this weekend, its first in movie theatres, industry estimates showed yesterday.

The sequel featuring Andrew Garfield in the title characters celebrated red and blue tights took in $92 million (around RM300 million) in 4,324 theatres, outperforming the original that went on to gross $262 million.

Falling to number two, romantic comedy "The Other Woman" starring Cameron Diaz earned $14.2 million its second week in theatres.

"Heaven Is For Real," starring Greg Kinnear as the father of a four-year-old boy who wakes up from emergency surgery with a story about going to heaven and back, held on to third place with $8.7 million in receipts.

"Captain America: The Winter Soldier," based on the iconic Marvel superhero starring Chris Evans, dropped to fourth from last week's second place finish. It pulled in $7.8 million.

Animated flick "Rio 2" about a family of blue Macaw parrots with voices by Jesse Eisenberg and Anne Hathaway slipped a notch to fifth with a gross of $7.6 million.

Behind it in sixth place, grossing $3.5 million in its second week was "Brick Mansions," a futuristic crime drama starring the late actor Paul Walker, who was killed in a high speed crash last November.

"Divergent," based on the popular young adult novel of the same name, took in $2.2 million, enough to lift into seventh place from ninth last week. Over seven weeks, it has grossed $142.7 million.

Eighth place went to "The Quiet Ones," the British horror film starring Jared Harris – son of late acting legend Richard Harris – which earned $2.0 million.

"God's Not Dead," in which a student tries to prove God's existence, dipped in box office earnings to $1.77 in its seventh week out, but still rose in the rankings to ninth.

Rounding out the top 10 was "The Grand Budapest Hotel," with $1.7 million. – AFP, May 5, 2014.

Kredit: http://www.themalaysianinsider.com

The Malaysian Insider :: Features

0 ulasan
Klik GAMBAR Dibawah Untuk Lebih Info
Sumber Asal Berita :-

The Malaysian Insider :: Features


Israeli settlers launch enclave in Palestinian business hub

Posted: 04 May 2014 05:48 PM PDT

May 05, 2014

Palestinians walk past a post office building in East Jerusalem April 29, 2014. A Jewish seminary, in a bustling commercial area in the same building as a post office serving thousands of Palestinians every day, is the first Jewish housing venture on Saladin Street, a main shopping thoroughfare across from the walled Old City. Palestinians and Israeli critics worry the placement of the academy in such a central location is asking for trouble in East Jerusalem, which has stayed largely trouble-free in recent years and which Palestinians hope will be the capital of a future state. – Reuters pic, May 5, 2014.Palestinians walk past a post office building in East Jerusalem April 29, 2014. A Jewish seminary, in a bustling commercial area in the same building as a post office serving thousands of Palestinians every day, is the first Jewish housing venture on Saladin Street, a main shopping thoroughfare across from the walled Old City. Palestinians and Israeli critics worry the placement of the academy in such a central location is asking for trouble in East Jerusalem, which has stayed largely trouble-free in recent years and which Palestinians hope will be the capital of a future state. – Reuters pic, May 5, 2014.The smell of fresh paint wafts through the domed lobby of the latest Israeli arrival in East Jerusalem – a Jewish seminary in a bustling commercial area in the same building as a post office serving thousands of Palestinians every day.

Otzmat Yerushalayim, which includes sleeping quarters and could house as many as 300 young Israelis, is the first Jewish housing venture on Saladin Street, a main shopping thoroughfare across from the walled Old City.

Palestinians and Israeli critics worry the placement of the academy in such a central location is asking for trouble in East Jerusalem, which has stayed largely trouble-free in recent years compared to the Gaza Strip and occupied West Bank, and which Palestinians hope will be the capital of a future state.

"Tensions are sure to spike here. It isn't going to be easy," a Palestinian pharmacist, who gave her name only as Maral, said in a drugstore across the street.

"They will just close us up the second a confrontation arises and all work will grind to a halt," she said.

Israel's annexation of East Jerusalem after its capture in a 1967 war has never been recognised, meaning most of the world views Israeli enclaves there as illegal settlements.

Settlement expansion has been a key sticking point in Israeli-Palestinian peace talks, which collapsed in April. But even when Israel froze construction temporarily in 2010, it always insisted the moratorium exclude East Jerusalem, which it views as an integral part of the country.

Unlike in the occupied territories, most Palestinians in East Jerusalem enjoy Israeli social benefits and looser travel restrictions, making them less motivated to engage in political protests.

Religious fervour runs deep in the holy city, however, and violence flared during the Jewish Passover holiday when Palestinians, gathered at a holy site revered by Muslims and Jews, threw rocks and firecrackers to try to prevent any attempt by ultranationalist Jews to pray there.

Israeli riot police used stun grenades to quell the protests at a plaza that overlooks Judaism's Western Wall and is home to al-Aqsa mosque, Islam's third holiest site. Jews refer to the area as the Temple Mount, the site of the two biblical Jewish temples.

Ateret Cohanim, the private organisation behind the seminary project, has been moving hundreds of Jewish families into predominantly Palestinian-inhabited East Jerusalem for years, either by acquiring property or laying claim to land Jews bought before Israel's founding in 1948.

It expects a formal opening ceremony to take place at the seminary later this month as part of Israeli celebrations of the 47th anniversary of its capture of East Jerusalem.

A teacher at the school, where a rabbi's portrait hung on freshly-painted walls amid benches and bunk beds, said it quietly opened its door a few weeks ago. The seminary's windows are painted white, shielding those inside from view from the street.

Daniel Luria, a spokesman for Ateret Cohanim, declined to comment on the seminary while accompanying Reuters on a tour of a half-dozen settlement projects the group has spearheaded in Palestinian residential neighbourhoods of East Jerusalem.

Luria said Ateret Cohanim, whose website suggests it raises more than half of its funds from donors in the United States, wanted Jews to live alongside Palestinians, not supplant them.

Some 200,000 Israelis have settled in East Jerusalem, which is home to about 280,000 Palestinians. Most live in largely separate areas.

"We're really just doing what Zionism has always been defined as, the return of the Jewish people to the Land of Israel. But we're doing that in an area in the heart of Jerusalem," Luria said.

It is not clear how Ateret Cohanim got ahold of a section of the five-storey structure housing the post office, built at a time when neighbouring Jordan controlled East Jerusalem.

Ateret Cohanim refuses to discuss its acquisitions, citing the issue's sensitivity. Settlement watchdog groups say an Israeli company that occupied the property put it up for sale.

The Israeli government often distances itself from the activities of pro-settler groups in East Jerusalem, generally leaving it up to the courts to decide in case of disputes.

It weighs in more on settlement in the occupied West Bank where it must authorize any enclaves before they are built – though dozens of settlement outposts have gone up without authorization over the years. Although the government often vows to remove them, that process often takes years.

A spokeswoman at the Israel Lands Authority, the government agency that oversees land and ownership, denied any knowledge of the seminary transaction.

Luria insisted that Ateret Cohanim was not political, but also said a majority of Israelis opposed relinquishing control over any of Jerusalem for a peace deal with Palestinians.

Asked whether his group was seeking to ensure this didn't happen, he replied: "Not that there are not ramifications behind Jews living in certain areas - we're not stupid."

Meir Margalit, a leader of the left-wing Meretz party's representatives in Israel's Jerusalem municipality, said he had sought European and U.S. intervention to try to block the seminary's opening.

"It's a sure recipe for violence. This is a very strategic site and there's a potential here to cause serious disruptions in civic life in this city," Margalit said.

Outside the post office building, Mohammed Tufaha, a 26-year-old Palestinian physical education teacher, sorted through a packet of letters he had just collected.

"Little by little, they are trying to overtake us. Soon they will move into other buildings as well and Judaise the entire area," he said. – Reuters, May 5, 2014.

Kredit: http://www.themalaysianinsider.com

The Malaysian Insider :: Opinion

0 ulasan
Klik GAMBAR Dibawah Untuk Lebih Info
Sumber Asal Berita :-

The Malaysian Insider :: Opinion


Nota selfie untuk Najib

Posted: 04 May 2014 04:59 PM PDT

May 05, 2014

Uthaya Sankar SB berkarya dalam Bahasa Malaysia. Beliau adalah presiden Kumpulan Sasterawan Kavyan (Kavyan) dan pemilik tunggal Perunding Media, Motivasi dan Penerbitan Uthaya. Selain menulis, membaca dan bercakap, beliau juga suka menonton filem.

Paparan 'selfie' Najib di Facebook mendapat perhatian ramai. – Gambar ihsan Uthaya Sankar, 5 Mei, 2014. Paparan 'selfie' Najib di Facebook mendapat perhatian ramai. – Gambar ihsan Uthaya Sankar, 5 Mei, 2014. "My selfie with President Obama!" Demikian catatan pada foto yang dipaparkan dengan penuh bangga oleh Perdana Menteri Malaysia Datuk Seri Najib Razak menerusi Facebook pada 27 April 2014 selepas berpeluang bertemu Presiden Amerika Syarikat, Barack Obama.

Sebagai seorang pengamal media dan perunding media, saya hanya mampu menepuk dahi memikirkan kejahilan dan kebodohan Najib terhadap istilah sebenar perkataan tersebut.

Foto yang dipaparkan bukanlah "selfie" tetapi "usie".

Mungkin Najib tidak berpeluang mendengar penerangan lengkap yang diberikan Arlene Tan, Gouri Krishnan dan Tan Kim menerusi slot "Asean Breakfast Call" (Durian Asean, 14 April 2014).

Mungkin tidak ada sesiapa yang membisikkan ke telinga Najib bahawa "selfie" (atau lebih popular sebagai #selfie) melibatkan satu orang sahaja.

Sekiranya foto yang dirakam itu menampilkan lebih daripada seorang – kecuali Najib dan Obama adalah satu orang – maka istilah yang betul adalah "usie" (atau #usie).

Beberapa fakta yang disajikan secara mudah menerusi makalah ini bertujuan berkongsi maklumat bersama-sama orang ramai supaya kita tidak terus jahil, khilaf dan mengulangi "kebodohan" yang dipamerkan oleh pemimpin.

Berkenaan usie Najib bersama Obama, timbul pula persoalan apakah tidak ada seorang pun manusia yang berada di tempat itu pada masa berkenaan untuk tolong ambilkan foto mesra mereka berdua.

Saya mengandaikan bahawa usie itu dirakam di tempat terbuka dan bukannya semasa Najib dan Obama berdua-duaan di tempat terselindung atau peribadi seperti bilik air dan tandas.

Mungkin juga Najib begitu ingin mengikut gaya semasa (trend) merakamkan selfie/usie sehingga tidak sanggup merelakan orang lain (termasuk isteri tercinta, wanita anggun Datin Seri Rosmah Mansor) mengambil foto menggunakan telefon pintarnya.

Untuk makluman bersama, sekiranya foto diambil orang lain – walaupun menggunakan telefon kita – maka ia tidak lagi memenuhi kriteria selfie atau usie.

Begitulah juga jika kita menggunakan kemudahan pemasa (timer) pada telefon pintar dan meletakkan alat itu di atas meja (atau apa-apa permukaan) untuk merakam foto. Ia menjadi foto biasa dan tidak lagi layak ditandakan (hashtag) sebagai #selfie dan #usie.

Amalan selfie bukan sesuatu yang baru muncul

Istilah usie mungkin masih baru dalam kalangan kita. Istilah selfie pula mula digunakan dalam kalangan orang yang berbual di ruangan forum dalam talian (online) di Australia pada tahun 2002.

Seperti kebanyakan istilah baru, istilah selfie juga diwujudkan secara tidak sedar oleh salah seorang individu yang berbual di ruangan forum itu.

Umum mengetahui bahawa istilah selfie menjadi amat popular pada tahun 2013 sehingga digelarkan sebagai "Tahun Selfie".

Seperti dibincangkan menerusi Durian Asean (14 April 2014), kini seolah-olah semua orang – termasuk politikus, pelakon, penyanyi dan peminta sedekah – tidak mahu terlepas daripada merakamkan foto peribadi berupa selfie.

Namun begitu, eloklah diketahui bahawa selfie bukanlah sesuatu yang baru; walaupun istilah selfie hanya wujud sejak tahun 2002.

Pada tahun 1839, seorang individu bernama Robert Cornelius dilaporkan menggunakan sebuah kamera antik untuk merakamkan foto sendiri.

Dia meletakkan kamera di atas meja dan membuka bahagian depan yang membolehkan cahaya masuk bagi merakam imej (foto) pada filem.

Tentu sahaja Robert menggunakan kamera jenis lama yang mengambil masa pendedahan selama beberapa minit untuk merakam satu foto.

Lelaki itu segera bergerak dan duduk di hadapan kamera. Beberapa minit kemudian, foto dirinya sudah dirakam.

Bagaimanapun, secara teknikal, ia bukan selfie kerana Robert tidak memegang sendiri kamera itu; sebaliknya seolah-olah menggunakan pemasa.

Pada tahun 1914 pula, seorang remaja wanita berumur 13 tahun di Rusia berdiri sambil memegang sebuah kamera (jenis lama juga) di hadapan cermin.

Dia merakamkan foto diri seperti yang biasa dilakukan orang ramai di hadapan cermin tandas awam sekarang.

Maka, terhasillah selfie pertama yang diketahui – walaupun istilah selfie belum wujud. Dengan perkembangan teknologi kamera dan telefon pintar, rakaman selfie dan usie sudah menjadi sesuatu yang terlalu biasa pada masa kini.

Sekiranya diteliti, kegemaran remaja merakam selfie agak popular sekitar tahun 2005 dengan adanya laman rangkaian sosial MySpace yang membuka ruang dan peluang berkongsi foto peribadi.

Kebanyakan foto ini bersifat peribadi dan dirakam sendiri – selfie – untuk dimuat naik ke laman MySpace.

Bagaimanapun, apabila Facebook mula popular sekitar tahun 2007, ramai pengguna MySpace beralih ke laman rangkaian sosial itu.

Pengguna juga mula meninggalkan selfie kerana foto-foto itu bersifat kurang profesional.

Mereka mula memaparkan foto-foto diri yang lebih profesional; sama ada diambil di studio atau diambil oleh orang lain menggunakan kamera dan telefon pintar.

Kalau Najib atau pengikutnya sedang membaca makalah ini, mungkin mereka tertanya-tanya di mana saya mendapat segala maklumat ini. Jawapannya mudah sahaja: membaca.

Persamaan psikologi antara politikus dan remaja

Amalan 'selfie' dan 'usie' boleh dikaji dari sudut psikologi. – Gambar ihsan Uthaya Sankar, 5 Mei, 2014. Amalan 'selfie' dan 'usie' boleh dikaji dari sudut psikologi. – Gambar ihsan Uthaya Sankar, 5 Mei, 2014. Berbalik kepada Facebook, lama-kelamaan, pengguna laman rangkaian sosial itu mula kembali berminat merakam dan memuatkan foto diri yang kurang profesional.

Maknanya, merakamkan selfie untuk dipaparkan kepada dunia dan rakan-rakan.

Pakar psikologi dan peribadi remaja (di luar Malaysia, tentunya) sedang terus mengkaji amalan selfie dari sudut psikologi dan sains perubatan.

Apatah lagi apabila selfie sudah menjadi semacam kegilaan dalam kalangan remaja – dan politikus.

Mengapa politikus gemar akan selfie? Hakikat yang tidak dapat dinafikan adalah bahawa politikus – termasuk di Malaysia – sentiasa mahukan dirinya menjadi fokus utama.

Mungkin politikus akan menafikannya, tetapi pada setiap kali membaca akhbar – atau menonton televisyen – mereka akan mencari-cari apakah ada berita dan foto mereka.

Bagi golongan remaja pula, mereka juga seperti politikus. Mereka mahukan perhatian daripada dunia.

Mereka mahukan supaya mereka penjadi pusat tumpuan dunia – seolah-olah Bumi harus berputar dengan berpaksi kepada mereka.

Apabila saya menyebut "remaja" tadi tidak pula bermakna golongan dewasa tidak memiliki "penyakit" itu.

Cuba layari Facebook dan lihat sendiri berapa ramai orang dewasa yang turut menjadi mangsa kegilaan selfie.

Sedar atau tidak sedar – ataupun mahu dinafikan sekeras-kerasnya – mereka semua mahukan perhatian.

Makalah ini tidak bertujuan menidakkan hak merakam selfie atau mengatakan selfie itu salah. (Kita serahkan "tugas murni" itu kepada Jakim, ISMA, Perkasa dan Ridhuan Tee.) Tambahan pula, saya juga kadang-kadang merakam selfie.

Sebaliknya, sekadar untuk menasihatkan Najib supaya tahu membezakan antara #selfie dan #usie apabila memuat naik fotonya ke Facebook pada masa hadapan.

Juga untuk menasihatkan rakan-rakan (dan pembaca makalah ini) supaya tidak terus-menerus memperli dan mentertawakan Najib atas perbuatan merakam usie bersama-sama Obama.

Ketahuilah bahawa sesungguhnya Najib sekadar membuktikan kepada dunia (dan rakyat Malaysia) bahawa dia sudah memenuhi kriteria "penyakit selfie" seperti yang sudah dikaji dan dibuktikan pakar psikologi antarabangsa (bukan Malaysia). – 5 Mei, 2014.

* Ini adalah pendapat peribadi penulis dan tidak semestinya mewakili pandangan The Malaysian Insider.

Mengapa berpecah kerana hudud, sedangkan GST ada untuk tumbangkan Umno?

Posted: 04 May 2014 04:57 PM PDT

May 05, 2014

Penulis adalah seorang jurutera semikonduktor, wartawan freelance, penerbit dan editor buku motivasi yang suka mengikuti perkembangan politik Malaysia

Setahun selepas 5 Mei 2013, kita melihat bagaimana negara menjadi terkenal di seluruh dunia kerana kejadian MH370.

Sebagai rakyat yang hidup di Lembah Klang, kita menyaksikan bagaimana Malaysia sebuah negara khatulistiwa yang terpaksa mengalami catuan air.

Di Selangor pula, kita menyaksikan bagaimana PKR bergolak di Langkah Kajang dan akhirnya gagal dalam usaha menggantikan Menteri Besar Selangor Khalid Ibrahim dengan Anwar Ibrahim.

Daripada hampir menjadi MB Selangor, nasib Anwar berubah secara drastik dan kini mungkin terpaksa ke penjara Kajang selepas dijatuhkan hukuman penjara kerana dakwaan liwat Saiful Bukhari.

Sehingga hari ini, tiga pilihanraya kecil – Kuala Besut, Sg Limau dan Kajang diadakan.

Dua lagi akan diadakan selepas ini, iaitu Bukit Gelugor dan Telok Intan, kedua-duanya kerusi milik DAP.

Dua tokoh politik besar pula meninggalkan kita – Ustaz Azizan Razak, bekas Menteri Besar Kedah dan saudara Karpal Singh, bekas pengerusi DAP yang meninggal dalam satu kemalangan.

Begitulah sudahnya tahun pertama selepas 505. Semua ini menunjukkan senario politik di Malaysia cukup dinamik.

Apakah 52% masih menyokong Pakatan Rakyat? Apakah BN masih kerajaan minoriti? Keputusan PRU13 tidak lagi boleh dijadikan ukuran populariti hari ini.

Hari ini kita melangkah masuk ke tahun kedua.

Di sebelah BN, masalah yang menghantui popularitinya sudah tentu ialah GST. Manakala di sebelah PR pula ialah isu hudud yang bergema semula.

Pada 1 Mei lepas, sebanyak 50 ribu orang menghadiri perhimpunan bantah GST.

Yang menakutkan Umno ialah siapa yang hadir. Apakah momentum menentang GST ini akan membara seperti perhimpunan Bersih dulu?

Umno sudah tentu sedar golongan berpendapatan sederhana dan rendah adalah golongan yang paling terkesan dengan pelaksanaan GST yang bermula pada 1 April 2015 nanti.

Dan kebetulan majoriti golongan ini adalah kumpulan pengundi yang memenangkan mereka di PRU13.

Golongan ini jugalah yang diharapkan Umno untuk mengekalkan kemenangan di PRU14.

Sempena kelahiran GST tahun depan, penulis percaya pemberian BR1M juga akan mencapai rekod tertinggi.

Ini adalah bagi mengalihkan kesakitan GST kepada golongan berpendapatan sederhana dan rendah untuk sementara waktu di samping mengharapkan pemberian BR1M ini dapat mengurangkan jumlah hadirin di himpunan anti-GST pada 1 Mei 2015 (bakal diadakan sekiranya pembangkang bijak.)

Sebelum PRU14, perkara yang paling dibimbangi Umno ialah kesan pada kadar inflasi akibat GST.

Antara semua isu, Umno tahu rakyat paling mementingkan keadaan ekonomi mereka, dan sudah terbukti di banyak negara, isu ekonomi paling mudah digunakan untuk menumbangkan sesebuah kerajaan.

Sekiranya rakyat mendapati harga barangan naik melambung secara mendadak sehingga mengganggu kehidupan mereka selepas GST, nyawa Umno akan berada di hujung tanduk apabila datangnya PRU14.

Oleh itu, adalah penting lawan Umno dapat dihapuskan terlebih dahulu sebelum itu.

Oleh itu, Umno kini bernafas agak lega apabila isu hudud bergema kembali di persada politik tanah air tatkala mereka bergelut dengan isu GST.

Penasihat DAP, Lim Kit Siang dalam satu kenyataan semalam menyatakan kebimbangannya bahawa PR akan berpecah kerana isu hudud.

Betul kata Kit Siang, Umno akan terus berkuasa meskipun ia melaksanakan sistem GST, sekiranya PR berpecah. Andaian ini sudah tentu menggembirakan Umno.

Masalahnya – wajarkah PR berpecah kerana hudud? DAP sudahpun tahu apa yang berlaku pada 2004 selepas mereka berpecah daripada Barisan Alternatif.

Umno di bawah Pak Lah memenangi 91% kerusi di Parlimen. Pernahkah DAP terfikir apakah kesudahannya jika Barisan Alternatif tidak berpecah?

Kontroversi hudud ialah masalah prinsip. Prinsip PAS ialah melaksanakan Islam. Prinsip DAP ialah mempertahankan Perlembagaan yang sekular.

PAS berpegang kepada Al-Quran yang tidak boleh diubah.

DAP berpegang pada Perlembagaan yang dikatakan menjaga semua hak rakyat Malaysia meskipun di dalamnya pernah terkandung Akta Keselamatan Dalam Negeri (ISA), Akta Hasutan, sebatan kejam dan hukuman gantung sampai mati yang dikenali kezalimannya.

Hudud mendapat persepsi negatif bukan kerana hudud tidak baik mahupun sempurna.

Seperti kata Naib Presiden PAS, Ustaz Tuan Ibrahim Tuan Man, manusia paling takut pada benda yang mereka tidak tahu, dan hudud tersenarai dalam kategori benda yang rakyat Malaysia tidak tahu.

Hakikatnya, para pendokong hudud menghadapi masalah persepsi negatif pada hudud kerana tiada negara Islam di dunia yang boleh memberikan contoh yang baik pada masyarakat dunia mengenai keberkesanan hudud dan keadilan Islam yang baik.

Ini menyebabkan mereka terpaksa menggunakan contoh pelaksanaan hudud di zaman Nabi untuk berhujah.

Nabi Muhammad berjaya kerana keadilan yang ditunjukkan Baginda. Kerana adil, hudud tidak menjadi masalah di zaman Rasullulah.

Sudah tentu hujah ini susah diterima oleh golongan yang masih tidak beriman pada Islam yang tidak mengenali siapa Rasullulah.

Ada yang takut ramai orang Melayu akan kudung tangan selepas hudud dilaksanakan.

Penulis tertanya-tanya, apakah mereka yang memberikan hujah ini berkata hudud ini bukan undang-undang yang baik atau hendak menuduh orang Melayu suka mencuri?

Di negara Saudi yang melaksanakan hudud, apakah mereka jumpa ramai orang Arab yang tangannya kudung kerana dipotong ketika berumrah ke sana?

Barangkali kita akan terjumpa lebih ramai orang yang kakinya terpaksa dipotong kerana diabetes berbanding mereka yang tangannya dipotong kerana hudud.

Ada yang melihat hudud ini kejam. Sebenarnya undang-undang manusia sama kejamnya. Di Malaysia, ada hukuman gantung sampai mati, di China, ada hukuman tembak sampai mati.

Sebatan yang dikenakan undang-undang manusia meskipun kurang daripada jumlah sebatan hudud, jauh beza kesakitan yang terpaksa ditanggung oleh penerima hukuman tersebut.

Satu menyebat untuk menghukum, satu lagi bersifat memalukan dan mendidik.

Ada yang terdengar hudud sahaja teringat upacara tangan dipotong, bagaikan mereka ini pencuri.

Cuba tanya mangsa ragut yang hampir kehilangan nyawa, apakah wajar tangan peragut dipotong?

Sudah tentu jawapan mereka berbeza daripada peguam yang berpendapat peragut juga ada hak untuk membela dirinya.

Cuba tanyakan ahli keluarga mangsa bunuh yang terpaksa berdepan dengan peguam handal yang membela pembunuh anak mereka?

Apakah pula pandangan mereka mengenai hudud berbanding dengan mereka yang bergelar pakar Perlembagaaan?

Bagi penulis, sungguh tidak berbaloi jika PR berpecah kerana masalah hudud, kerana kontroversi hudud lebih kepada masalah persepsi daripada Perlembagaan, seperti juga masalah politik yang lain-lain.

PAS dan DAP bersetuju untuk bekerjasama untuk perkara-perkara yang mereka persetujui bersama dan bergerak atas inisiatif sendiri bagi perkara-perkara yang masih tidak dipersetujui.

Apakah kerana hudud, DAP sudah tidak bersetuju dengan PAS untuk segala perkara yang mereka persetujui bersama di PR? Sudah tentu tidak.

Kerajaan negeri Pulau Pinang pada hakikatnya ialah kerajaan DAP, bukan PR. Begitu juga kerajaan negeri Kelantan, yang pada hakikatnya ialah kerajaan PAS, bukan PR.

Hanya kerajaan negeri Selangor yang betul-betul adalah sebuah kerajaan PR.

Jika DAP dan PKR boleh mengakui Enakmen Kanun Jenayah Syariah Kelantan 1993 ada sebelum wujudnya PR, mengapa tidak mahu menerima hakikat bahawa kerajaan PAS negeri Kelantan yang menawarkan hudud sudah wujud sebelum wujudnya PR lagi?

Dan hakikat bahawa sokongan rakyat Kelantan terhadap PAS tidak pernah terjejas kerana hudud, sehinggakan tsunami Umno 2004 juga gagal menumbangkan kerajaan PAS Kelantan.

Kemungkinan itulah keistimewaan yang dimiliki kerajaan PAS Kelantan yang wajar dihormati bagi para penentang hudud.

Barangkali keistimewaan inilah yang DAP boleh berikan kepada rakan strategiknya di Kelantan pada cubaan melaksanakan hudud tanpa memberikan tekanan bahawa usaha mereka menunaikan janji mereka ini akan meretakkan PR.

Hudud ataupun tidak, DAP dan PAS perlu komited untuk memastikan PR terus wujud atas dasar bersama.

Yang dasar berbeza, biarlah parti yang memperjuangkannya bergerak secara parti individu.

Itulah keistimewaan PR, bukan satu keburukan, yang wajar dipertahankan supaya ia kekal berbeza sebagai pilihan alternatif kepada Umno-BN.

Buat apa berpecah kalau tahu ia akan menguntungkan Umno? Buat apa bergaduh kalau sudah setuju untuk tidak bersetuju dalam isu hudud?

Apa lagi yang perlu didesakkan selepas setuju untuk tidak bersetuju?

Akhirnya, hudud tidak sepatutnya menjadi alasan bagi PAS dan DAP untuk melepaskan peluang untuk menumbangkan Umno di PRU14 menggunakan isu GST yang diperkenalkannya. – 5 Mei, 2014.

* Ini adalah pendapat peribadi penulis dan tidak semestinya mewakili pandangan The Malaysian Insider.

Kredit: http://www.themalaysianinsider.com

The Malaysian Insider :: Bahasa

0 ulasan
Klik GAMBAR Dibawah Untuk Lebih Info
Sumber Asal Berita :-

The Malaysian Insider :: Bahasa


Dua maut dalam nahas membabitkan empat kenderaan di Kuala Terengganu

Posted: 05 May 2014 03:11 AM PDT

May 05, 2014

Dua orang maut dalam nahas yang membabitkan empat kenderaan termasuk sebuah lori di Kilometer 29, Jalan Kuala Terengganu-Kota Baru kira-kira 10 pagi tadi.

Yang maut ialah pemandu lori Mohd Ghani Embong, 44, dari Wakaf Mesira, Tepoh dan pemandu kereta Perodua MyVi, Rohaiza Yusof, 35, dari Marang.

Seorang saksi berkata lori berkenaan yang hilang kawalan merempuh tiga kenderaan yang datang dari arah bertentangan, sebelum lori itu terjunam ke dalam gaung sedalam tiga meter.

Kereta yang dipandu Rohaiza dikatakan terbabas ke kiri jalan dan turut merempuh sebuah van sebelum keretanya turut terjatuh ke dalam gaung.

Ketua Balai Bomba dan Penyelamat Kuala Terengganu, Kamarul Bieza Mohd Kassim berkata pihaknya mengambil masa selama 20 minit untuk mengeluarkan mangsa yang tersepit di dalam kedua-dua kenderaan tersebut.

"Pemandu van itu selamat manakala pemandu sebuah kereta Proton Iswara iaitu seorang wanita cedera dan kedua-dua mereka dibawa ke Hospital Sultanah Nur Zahirah," katanya.

Ketua Polis Daerah Kuala Terengganu ACP Zamri Shamsuddin mengesahkan kejadian itu. – Bernama, 5 Mei, 2014.

Teresa akan didakwa di bawah Akta Hasutan esok kerana video ‘Onederful Malaysia’

Posted: 05 May 2014 02:58 AM PDT

May 05, 2014
Latest Update: May 05, 2014 06:06 pm

Ahli Parlimen Seputeh Teresa Kok akan didakwa di bawah Akta Hasutan esok ekoran video "Onederful Malaysia" yang didakwa menghina Muslim dan pemimpin negara.

Dia dijangka akan didakwa di Mahkamah Sesyen Kuala Lumpur jam 9 pagi, menurut satu kenyataan dari pejabatnya yang mengesahkan perkara ini.

Kok didakwa menghina Muslim, pasukan keselamatan, perdana menteri dan isterinya dalam video satira berbahasa Cina yang dimasukkan ke dalam YouTube 27 Januari lalu.

Walaupun Kok menjelaskan bukan niatnya untuk menghina sesiapa, pelbagai serangan dan lebih daripada 300 laporan polis dibuat terhadapnya.

Satu rangkaian pertubuhan bukan kerajaan menawarkan RM1,200 kepada sesiapa yang menampar Kok di samping upacara menyembelih ayam ke atas gambar beliau dan beberapa ahli pembangkang lain. – 5 Mei, 2014.

MENYUSUL LAGI

Kredit: http://www.themalaysianinsider.com
 

Malaysia Insider Online

Copyright 2010 All Rights Reserved